Stefan Urbat wrote:
By the way, I have to wait a few hours to umount and check mountpoint
permissions, because an automated build is currently running on that
zfs --- the performance of [EMAIL PROTECTED] is indeed rather poor (much worse
than ufs), but this is another, already documented and bug
You were completely right in guessing the issue: after umount /export/home the
ZFS residing there the wrong (?), but likely standard Solaris 10, not ufs
affecting attribute mask was visible: 700. After changing this to 755 and
mounting the ZFS thereon again, the issue was resolved completely. Th
>
> >On 10/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >- Should ZFS respect the umask setting even when it
> is creating the mountpoint?
>
>
> No (I think this is being fixed).
>
Nice to hear, this is a very strange phenomenon as told.
> >- Should Solaris (in general) ignore moun
