> > >On 10/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >- Should ZFS respect the umask setting even when it > is creating the mountpoint? > > > No (I think this is being fixed). >
Nice to hear, this is a very strange phenomenon as told. > >- Should Solaris (in general) ignore mountpoint > permissions? > > > Yes, I believe so. > > Casper > I fully agree to this: I never encountered any comparable consequence of ill mountpoint permissions on any Unix: so I would expect a successful mount should always hide completely the original mountpoint permissions resp. render them irrelevant, only using the current, mounted file system permissions. By the way, I have to wait a few hours to umount and check mountpoint permissions, because an automated build is currently running on that zfs --- the performance of [EMAIL PROTECTED] is indeed rather poor (much worse than ufs), but this is another, already documented and bug entry "honoured" issue. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
