[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Interesting. The HDS folks I talked to said the array no-ops the cache sync.
> Which models were you using? Midrange only, right?
HDS "modular" product -- ours is 9520V, which was the smallest available.
It has a mix of FC and SATA drives (yes, really).
Check the HDS f
The info in that tuning guide depends on what Solaris version you are working
with. Last I checked it was not current.
I use Solaris 10u4 and have zfs_nocacheflush set. Haven't played with using
alternate disks for ZIL yet not really sure what that does to my HA model. I
have mirrored LUNS b
Marion Hakanson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
>> They clearly suggest to disable cache flush http://www.solarisinternals.com/
>> wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#FLUSH .
>>
>> It seems to be the only serious article on the net about this subject.
>>
>> Could someone here state on this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> They clearly suggest to disable cache flush http://www.solarisinternals.com/
> wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#FLUSH .
>
> It seems to be the only serious article on the net about this subject.
>
> Could someone here state on this tuning suggestion ? My cu is run
Hi,
I read some articles on solarisinternals.com like "ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide" on
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide . They
clearly suggest to disable cache flush
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#FLUSH .
It seems to be t
