I'm also a Mac user. I use Mozy instead of DropBox, but it sounds like
DropBox should get a place at the table. I'm about to download it in a few
minutes.
I'm right now re-cloning my internal HD due to some HFS+ weirdness. I
have to completely agree that ZFS would be a great addition to MacOS
Funny, I thought the same thing up until a couple of years ago when I
thought Apple should have bought Sun :-)
Cordialement,
Erik Ableson
+33.6.80.83.58.28
Envoyé depuis mon iPhone
On 19 mars 2010, at 09:41, Khyron khyron4...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, I'm the only person I know who said
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Khyron wrote:
Getting better FireWire performance on OpenSolaris would be nice though.
Darwin drivers are open...hmmm.
OS-X is only (legally) used on Apple hardware. Has anyone considered
that since Firewire is important to Apple, they may have selected a
particular
On 19 Mar 2010, at 15:30, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Khyron wrote:
Getting better FireWire performance on OpenSolaris would be nice though.
Darwin drivers are open...hmmm.
OS-X is only (legally) used on Apple hardware. Has anyone considered that
since Firewire is
The point I think Bob was making is that FireWire is an Apple technology, so
they have a vested interest in making sure it works well on their systems
and
with their OS. They could even have a specific chipset that they
exclusively
use in their systems, although I don't see why others couldn't
k == Khyron khyron4...@gmail.com writes:
k FireWire is an Apple technology, so they have a vested
k interest in making sure it works well [...] They could even
k have a specific chipset that they exclusively use in their
k systems,
yes, you keep repeating yourselves, but
It would appear that the bus bandwidth is limited to about 10MB/sec
(~80Mbps) which is well below the theoretical 400Mbps that 1394 is
supposed to be able to handle. I know that these two disks can go
significantly higher since I was seeing 30MB/sec when they were used on
Macs previously in
An interesting thing I just noticed here testing out some Firewire drives with
OpenSolaris.
Setup :
OpenSolaris 2009.06 and a dev version (snv_129)
2 500Gb Firewire 400 drives with integrated hubs for daisy-chaining (net: 4
devices on the chain)
- one SATA bridge
- one PATA bridge
Created a
On Thu, March 18, 2010 04:50, erik.ableson wrote:
It would appear that the bus bandwidth is limited to about 10MB/sec
(~80Mbps) which is well below the theoretical 400Mbps that 1394 is
supposed to be able to handle. I know that these two disks can go
significantly higher since I was seeing
On 18 mars 2010, at 16:58, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
On Thu, March 18, 2010 04:50, erik.ableson wrote:
It would appear that the bus bandwidth is limited to about 10MB/sec
(~80Mbps) which is well below the theoretical 400Mbps that 1394 is
supposed to be able to handle. I know that these two
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, erik.ableson wrote:
Ditto on the Linux front. I was hoping that Solaris would be the
exception, but no luck. I wonder if Apple wouldn't mind lending one
of the driver engineers to OpenSolaris for a few months...
Perhaps the issue is the filesystem rather than the
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, erik.ableson wrote:
Ditto on the Linux front. I was hoping that Solaris would be the
exception, but no luck. I wonder if Apple wouldn't mind lending one
of the driver engineers to OpenSolaris for a few months...
Perhaps the issue is the
Apple users have different expectations regarding data loss than Solaris and
Linux users do.
Come on, no Apple user bashing. Not true, not fair.
Scott
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
On Mar 18, 2010, at 14:23, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010, erik.ableson wrote:
Ditto on the Linux front. I was hoping that Solaris would be the
exception, but no luck. I wonder if Apple wouldn't mind lending
one of the driver engineers to OpenSolaris for a few months...
14 matches
Mail list logo
