Can anyone comment?
-Brian
Brian H. Nelson wrote:
Adam Leventhal wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:01:28PM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
Why does this happen? Is it a bug? I know there is a recommendation of
20% free space for good performance, but that thought never occurred to
me when
Adam Leventhal wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:01:28PM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
Why does this happen? Is it a bug? I know there is a recommendation of
20% free space for good performance, but that thought never occurred to
me when this machine was set up (zvols only, no zfs proper).
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 01:36:10AM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> btw: I assume that compression level will be hard coded after all,
> right?
Nope. You'll be able to choose from gzip-N with N ranging from 1 to 9 just
like gzip(1).
Adam
--
Adam Leventhal, Solaris Kernel Development http:
Hello Adam,
Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 1:24:35 AM, you wrote:
AL> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 01:23:06AM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> Adam, while you are here, what about gzip compression in ZFS?
>> I mean are you going to integrate changes soon?
AL> I submitted the RTI today.
Great!
btw: I a
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 01:23:06AM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> Adam, while you are here, what about gzip compression in ZFS?
> I mean are you going to integrate changes soon?
I submitted the RTI today.
Adam
--
Adam Leventhal, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/ahl
__
Hello Adam,
Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 12:42:49 AM, you wrote:
AL> On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:01:28PM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
>> Why does this happen? Is it a bug? I know there is a recommendation of
>> 20% free space for good performance, but that thought never occurred to
>> me when thi
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:01:28PM -0400, Brian H. Nelson wrote:
> Why does this happen? Is it a bug? I know there is a recommendation of
> 20% free space for good performance, but that thought never occurred to
> me when this machine was set up (zvols only, no zfs proper).
It sounds like this b
Dear list,
Solaris 10 U3 on SPARC.
I had a 197GB raidz storage pool. Within that pool, I had allocated a
191GB zvol (filesystem A), and a 6.75GB zvol (filesystem B). These used
all but a couple hundred K of the zpool. Both zvols contained UFS
filesystems with logging enabled. The (A) filesyst
