[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> That's the one that's been an issue for me and my customers - they get billed
> back for GB allocated to their servers by the back end arrays. To be more
> explicit about the 'self-healing properties' - To deal with any fs
> corruption situation that would traditionally
> "vf" == Vincent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
vf> Because arrays & drives can suffer silent errors in the data
vf> that are not found until too late. My zpool scrubs
vf> occasionally find & FIX errors that none of the array or
vf> RAID-5 stuff caught.
well, just to make i
> Why would the customer need to use raidz or zfs
> mirroring if the array
> is doing it for them? As someone else posted,
> metadata is already
> redundant by default and doesn't consume a ton of
> space.
Because arrays & drives can suffer silent errors in the data that are not found
unti
>
>
> That's the one that's been an issue for me and my customers - they
> get billed back for GB allocated to their servers by the back end
> arrays.
> To be more explicit about the 'self-healing properties' -
> To deal with any fs corruption situation that would traditionally
> require an f
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:46:47AM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote:
>
>Wednesday, August 20, 2008, 7:11:01 PM, you wrote:
>
>I'm currently working out details on an upgrade from UFS/SDS on DAS to
>ZFS on a SAN fabric. I'm interested in hearing how ZFS has behaved in
>more tra
Brian Wilson wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, August 21, 2008 5:47 am
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS with Traditional SAN
> To: Aaron Blew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolar
- Original Message -
From: Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, August 21, 2008 5:47 am
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS with Traditional SAN
To: Aaron Blew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Hello Aaron,
>
>
> Wednesday, Aug
Hello Aaron,
Wednesday, August 20, 2008, 7:11:01 PM, you wrote:
>
All,
I'm currently working out details on an upgrade from UFS/SDS on DAS to ZFS on a SAN fabric. I'm interested in hearing how ZFS has behaved in more traditional SAN environments using gear that scales vertically like EM
>
> All,I'm currently working out
> details on an upgrade from UFS/SDS on DAS to ZFS on a
> SAN fabric. I'm interested in hearing how
> ZFS has behaved in more traditional SAN environments
> using gear that scales vertically like EMC
> Clarion/HDS AMS/3PAR etc. Do you experience
> issues with zp
All,
I'm currently working out details on an upgrade from UFS/SDS on DAS to ZFS
on a SAN fabric. I'm interested in hearing how ZFS has behaved in more
traditional SAN environments using gear that scales vertically like EMC
Clarion/HDS AMS/3PAR etc. Do you experience issues with zpool integrity
be
10 matches
Mail list logo
