I don't want to run SXCE anymore. I'm trying to decide between:
EON ZFS NAS
http://eonstorage.blogspot.com/
--or--
NexentaCore Platform (v2.0 RC3)
http://www.nexenta.org/os/NexentaCore
--or--
OpenSolaris 2009.06 (when it's released)
My needs are:
* Easy package management
* Easy upgrades
*
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Joe S wrote:
> EON ZFS NAS
> http://eonstorage.blogspot.com/
No idea.
> NexentaCore Platform (v2.0 RC3)
> http://www.nexenta.org/os/NexentaCore
Personally, I tried it few times. For now, it is still too much broken
for me yet and looks scary. Previous version is
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Bogdan M. Maryniuk
wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Joe S wrote:
>> EON ZFS NAS
>> http://eonstorage.blogspot.com/
>
> No idea.
>
>> NexentaCore Platform (v2.0 RC3)
>> http://www.nexenta.org/os/NexentaCore
>
> Personally, I tried it few times. For now, it
Anil Gulecha wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Bogdan M. Maryniuk
wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Joe S wrote:
EON ZFS NAS
http://eonstorage.blogspot.com/
No idea.
NexentaCore Platform (v2.0 RC3)
http://www.nexenta.org/os/NexentaCore
Personally, I
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Anil Gulecha wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> Which particular packages were these? RC3 is quite stable, and all
> server packages are solid. If you do face issues with a particular
> one, we'd appreciate a bug report. All information on this is
> helpful..
Well, I don't r
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Bogdan M. Maryniuk
wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Anil Gulecha wrote:
>> Hi Bogdan,
>>
>> Which particular packages were these? RC3 is quite stable, and all
>> server packages are solid. If you do face issues with a particular
>> one, we'd appreciate a
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Anil Gulecha wrote:
> Yes, NCP's Desktop side components (X/Gnome/XFCE) is untested, and
> explains the issues. The focus is on the core.. and it has been so
> since the move from Gnusolaris (the older Gnome based Nexenta) to
> Nexenta Core platform. The idea was a
On Sun, 24 May 2009 18:24:35 +0900
"Bogdan M. Maryniuk" wrote:
> Anyone add StormOS to the distrowatch, please?
If so, than you may add OSUNIX too. It seems like a nice new project,
not BeneLix has joined the "community"
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | nevad
May be what you saying is true wrt. NexentaCore 2.0. But hey, think
about open source principals and development process. We do hope that
NexentaCore will become an official Debian distribution some day! We
evolving and driven completely by the community here. Anyone can
participate and fix the
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Anil Gulecha wrote:
> One example is StormOS, and XFCE based distro being built on NCP2.
> According to the latest blog entry.. a release is imminent. Perhaps
> you'll have better desktop experience with this. (www.stormos.org)
So.Tried it just now. Shortly: I'd s
Js.lists,
My needs are:
* Easy package management
There is no pkgadd or ips included in EON. You can however add IPS and retrieve
any of its available packages.
* Easy upgrades
EON is fairly easy to upgrade and the risk is low. All you have to do is
preserve your previous image before upgrading
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Andre Lue wrote:
> Feel free to give EON a twirl. It will only cost you CD and the time to burn
> and boot it. Or if you have a VM you can test it there. You'll know reallly
> fast if it has enough of a framework for you to add the missing bits you need
> or not.
Hi Bogdan,
I'd recommend the following RAM minimums for a fair balance of performance.
700Mb 32-bit
1Gb 64-bit
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/l
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Andre Lue wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> I'd recommend the following RAM minimums for a fair balance of performance.
> 700Mb 32-bit
> 1Gb 64-bit
OK, it probably means 2GB when it goes actually practical. :-) Thanks!
--
Kind regards, bm
__
14 matches
Mail list logo
