[zfs-discuss] need some explanation

2007-04-30 Thread tester
Hi, OS : Solaris 10 11/06 zpool list doesn't reflect pool usage stats instantly. Why? # ls -l total 209769330 -rw--T 1 root root 107374182400 Apr 30 14:28 deleteme # zpool list NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT wo136G10

Re: [zfs-discuss] need some explanation

2007-04-30 Thread Darren Dunham
> zpool list doesn't reflect pool usage stats instantly. Why? > > # ls -l > total 209769330 > -rw--T 1 root root 107374182400 Apr 30 14:28 deleteme > > # zpool list > NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT > wo136G100G 36.0G

Re: [zfs-discuss] need some explanation

2007-04-30 Thread Justin Stringfellow
zpool list doesn't reflect pool usage stats instantly. Why? This is no different to how UFS behaves. If you rm a file, this uses the system call unlink(2) to do the work which is asynchronous. In other words, unlink(2) almost immediately returns a successful return code to rm (which can the

Re: [zfs-discuss] need some explanation

2007-04-30 Thread Darren Dunham
> > zpool list doesn't reflect pool usage stats instantly. Why? > > This is no different to how UFS behaves. It is different now (although I spent about 5 minutes looking for an old bug that would point to *when* the UFS change went in, I wasn't able to find one). > If you rm a file, this uses t

Re: [zfs-discuss] need some explanation

2007-04-30 Thread Bill Sommerfeld
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 16:53 -0700, Darren Dunham wrote: > > > zpool list doesn't reflect pool usage stats instantly. Why? > > > > This is no different to how UFS behaves. > > It is different now (although I spent about 5 minutes looking for an old > bug that would point to *when* the UFS change w