Re: [zfs-discuss] pool as root of zone

2009-10-19 Thread Hank Ratzesberger
Thanks again for comments, I want to clear this up with a few notes: o In OSOL 2009-06, zones MUST be installed in a zfs filesystem. o This is different than any dataset specified, which is like adding an fs. And of course if you specify as a dataset the same zfs pool that you installed into

Re: [zfs-discuss] pool as root of zone

2009-10-16 Thread Hank Ratzesberger
(hoping email replies OK) On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Ian Collins wrote: [snip] >> o Do zfs resources (datasets) need to be a separate item from the >> mountpoint of the zone? >> > > Yes, they do.  A zone's dataset is a ZFS filesystem which is "owned' by the > zone.  Once a filesystem is

Re: [zfs-discuss] pool as root of zone

2009-10-15 Thread Bryan Allen
> Hank Ratzesberger wrote: > Hi, I'm Hank and I'm recovering from a crash attempting to make a zfs > pool the root/mountpoint of a zone install. > > I want to make the zone appear as a completely configurable zfs file system > to the root user of the zone. Apparently that is not exactly the way

Re: [zfs-discuss] pool as root of zone

2009-10-15 Thread Ian Collins
Hank Ratzesberger wrote: Hi, I'm Hank and I'm recovering from a crash attempting to make a zfs pool the root/mountpoint of a zone install. I want to make the zone appear as a completely configurable zfs file system to the root user of the zone. Apparently that is not exactly the way things wo

[zfs-discuss] pool as root of zone

2009-10-15 Thread Hank Ratzesberger
Hi, I'm Hank and I'm recovering from a crash attempting to make a zfs pool the root/mountpoint of a zone install. I want to make the zone appear as a completely configurable zfs file system to the root user of the zone. Apparently that is not exactly the way things work. Any thoughts otherwis