Hi,
I have a machine whose zpools are at version 28, and I would like to
keep them at that version for portability between OSes. I understand
that 'zpool status' asks me to upgrade, but so does 'zpool status -x'
(the man page says it should only report errors or unavailability).
This is a problem
On Oct 4, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a machine whose zpools are at version 28, and I would like to
keep them at that version for portability between OSes. I understand
that 'zpool status' asks me to upgrade, but so does 'zpool status -x'
(the man page
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 4, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:
The return code for zpool is ambiguous. Do not rely upon it to determine
if the pool is healthy. You should check the health property instead.
Huh. Learn
2012-10-04 20:36, Freddie Cash пишет:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 4, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:
The return code for zpool is ambiguous. Do not rely upon it to determine
if the pool is healthy. You should check the
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Jim Klimov jimkli...@cos.ru wrote:
2012-10-04 20:36, Freddie Cash пишет:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Oct 4, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Jan Owoc jso...@gmail.com wrote:
The return code for zpool is ambiguous. Do not
