Re: [zfs-discuss] unexpected ZFS behavior

2008-02-13 Thread Jeremy Kister
On 2/5/2008 2:45 PM, Jeremy Kister wrote: >> 1. What do I have to do (short of replacing the seemingly good disk) to >> get c3t8d0 back online? I ended up applying patches 124205-05 and 118855-36. things are much better now, but there are still [at least] two issues remaining. with my zpool in

Re: [zfs-discuss] unexpected ZFS behavior

2008-02-05 Thread Jeremy Kister
On 2/4/2008 5:40 PM, Jeremy Kister wrote: > 1. What do I have to do (short of replacing the seemingly good disk) to > get c3t8d0 back online? I did find a related thread: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2006-June/032179.html but the thread ended without a resolution. also, fo

[zfs-discuss] unexpected ZFS behavior

2008-02-04 Thread Jeremy Kister
I've got ZFS running on Solaris s10x_u3wos_10 X86 on a v40z, which has two PCI SCSI controllers, each connected to it's own external HP Diskarray (MSA30) with 7 disks + hot spare. Both controllers are: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI The disks are a mix o