On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:02:03PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:10:19PM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
-
# zpool scrub tank
# zpool status -v tank
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices could not be used because the
Pawel,
Is this a problem with ZFS trying to open the device twice?
Richard,
Yes a scrub should fix the device. One of zfs' faetures is ease of
administration. It seems to defy logic that a scrub does not fix all devices,
if possible. Why make it any harder for the admin?
Cheers.
This
MP wrote:
Hi,
I hope someone can help cos ATM zfs' logic seems a little askew.
I just swapped a failing 200gb drive that was one half of a 400gb gstripe
device which I was using as one of the devices in a 3 device raidz1. When the
OS came back up after the drive had been changed, the
more below...
MP wrote:
On 03/10/2007, *Richard Elling* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. From the fine manual on zpool:
zpool replace [-f] pool old_device [new_device]
Replaces old_device with new_device. This is equivalent
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:10:19PM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
-
# zpool scrub tank
# zpool status -v tank
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is
missing or
invalid. Sufficient replicas exist for the
I think I might have run into the same problem. At the time I assumed I was
doing something wrong, but...
I made a b72 raidz out of three new 1gb virtual disks in vmware. I shut the vm
off, replaced one of the disks with a new 1.5gb virtual disk. No matter what
command I tried, I couldn't
