My sentiments exactly!
Stacy.
At 02:50 PM 11/05/2003 -0900, you wrote:
Gerald Smith wrote:
Your list is doctrinal. But once one begins scratching the surface of
these ideas, we leave the area of doctrine and enter into speculation.
For example,
1. There is a God with a body, but was he a Savi
It is a wise person who can state when he doesn't know. There's nothing
wrong with pondering and some speculating, as long as it doesn't become a
personal doctrine that we insist on pushing onto others. I don't know the
answers to any of those questions, either. I do have some personal ideas
on som
Gerald Smith wrote:
Your list is doctrinal. But once one begins scratching the surface of
these ideas, we leave the area of doctrine and enter into speculation.
For example,
1. There is a God with a body, but was he a Savior on his own planet?
I don't know.
2. Is Christ the savior of just this
Your list is doctrinal. But once one begins scratching the surface of these ideas, we
leave the area of doctrine and enter into speculation.
For example,
1. There is a God with a body, but was he a Savior on his own planet?
2. Is Christ the savior of just this world, all the universe? What?
3.
many ways, to be
careful.
George
- Original Message -
From: "John W. Redelfs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:43 PM
Subject: [ZION] The Cruelty of False Doctrine
> George Cobabe wrote:
> >In my opinion, t
George Cobabe wrote:
In my opinion, there are many Latter-day Saints who do not understand how
unloving and even cruel it is to teach false doctrine.
John W. Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John, it is equally cruel to teach that the only true doctrine is the one
and the way you u
