On 24 Feb 2014, at 11:16 , Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 10:37:38 -0500,
> Jim Fulton wrote :
>> I've created a new ZODB mailing list via google groups:
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/zodb
>
> If others are wondering how to join the group without using a gmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/24/10 00:11 , Laurence Rowe wrote:
> I created the zodbdocs following the examples of zope2docs and
> zope3docs for docs.zope.org. Jens Vagelpohl added them to the cron job
> that updates docs.zope.org and is the person responsible for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
... just to check if the list is broken as Martin Aspeli seems to believe.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkxaZjQACgkQRAx5nvEhZLJnOwCfRosCbl5sQH8cuD1ZwNG2r7NN
aFQAn1MVXOXYErTz9Rmd0dkJyXAkSl6U
=ED9Q
-END P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/14/10 10:19 , Shane Hathaway wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 01:43 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> My question: Is there any risk associated with ignoring the failure
>> during packing? The latest object versions for the persistent objects in
Hi all,
In a system using Zope 2.11 and ZODB 3.7.0b3 I'm having a problem with
old transaction records containing pickle data that fails on
cPickle.Unpickler.noload as employed by ZODB.serialize.referencesf, I
get an AttributeError from inside the cPickle module:
def referencesf(p, oids=None):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/12/10 13:21 , Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 5/12/10 13:07 , Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> B. Change ZODB so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/12/10 13:07 , Jim Fulton wrote:
> B. Change ZODB so that the root object is a variant of persistent
>mapping that either refuses to store more than a small number of
>objects, or at least issues a warning when more than a small
>number
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/27/10 12:29 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> What do folks think about this? Should missing records be ignored? Or
>> should the missing record cause the pack (or maybe just GC) to fail?
>
> Mmh,
On Sep 14, 2009, at 13:27 , Chris Withers wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Sadly, when you're trying to figure out which folder is using all
the
space on a disk that's running out of space, that's not practical...
How about simply writing a script that crawls the ZODB and gives
On Sep 14, 2009, at 13:10 , Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
ZODB doesn't provide any direct support because it has no notion of
tree.
Does it have any notion of object size on disk for a given object?
In Zope 2, you could export the folder and look at the size of the
export.
Sad
On Jul 31, 2008, at 17:37 , Chris Withers wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Sounds logical to me. The running instance and your zopectl run-
script work in the same space with identical configurations, so
both will start using the same ZEO cache file. To me this sounds
like a recipe for
On Jul 31, 2008, at 17:23 , Chris Withers wrote:
I didn't realise (and I've done it often and never experienced this
in the past) than running a zopectl run script from the same
instance home as a running client could result in ZEO client cache
corruption.
Should this be the case?
Sound
On Feb 5, 2008, at 01:57 , Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
Where can I find the zodb tools (fsrefs.py, fstest.py, etc) as
appropriate for the zodb that ships with Zope 2.9.6?
iirc, 2.9.6 was one of the releases that didn't ship with ZODBTools
due to a bug, so I'm looking for places to hunt!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3 Aug 2007, at 06:56, David Pratt wrote:
I ask this since setting threads to 1 improved performance
according to the recent high performance zope session by Lovely
systems at europython.
Just setting the number of threads to 1 won't improve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10 Apr 2007, at 20:19, Alan Runyan wrote:
File "/usr/local/python-2.4.4/lib/python2.4/asyncore.py", line
343, in rec
v
data = self.socket.recv(buffer_size)
error: (113, 'No route to host')
File "/usr/local/python-2.4.4/lib/python2.4/a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28 Mar 2007, at 11:02, Atmasamarpan Novy wrote:
Two level cache:
A current ZODB cache will become a first level cache (L1), each
ZODB connection maintains its own copy. When an object is needed it
reads it from L2 cache instead from a storage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 21 Mar 2007, at 17:29, Chris Withers wrote:
I'm hoping for some means to just lop transactions off the end of
the Data.fs until I get to the point in time I want...
Why don't you just record the exact size of your Data.fs before
starting you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28 Jan 2007, at 00:18, Simon Burton wrote:
I have a Persistent object, however, its attributes only
get loaded from the storage when I request a specific attribute.
Problem is, I don't know the names of the attributes
necessarily. I was trying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18 Nov 2006, at 17:23, Mark Bartlett wrote:
My real goal is to create articles from external sources and insert
them
into zope. XML seems the logical way to go. Is there a better way?
-msb ;)
IMHO trying to "abuse" the ZODB import/export-mech
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2 Oct 2006, at 16:54, Juan Pablo Giménez wrote:
El lun, 02-10-2006 a las 22:20 +0200, Roché Compaan escribió:
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 17:19 -0300, Juan Pablo Giménez wrote: > El
lun, 02-10-2006 a las 14:00 -0400, Benji York escribió: > > >>
"D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2 Oct 2006, at 14:07, Russ Ferriday wrote:
But for an app to be writing into thin air without complaining -
THAT's a bug!
Even having a backup of the Data.fs would not help!
Not picking on zope, but if that's what's happening it has to be
ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3 Jul 2006, at 01:10, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 7/2/06, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder if there's something to be said for having a generic object
indexing service that didn't use ZODB but used its own local
indexes and
re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7 Jun 2006, at 11:53, Richard Jennings wrote:
Hi,
I have a Zope2.7.2/Zeo2.2.2 instance running, using the standard
zope.conf &
zeo.conf settings (exception: port=8081) and it works fine. I want
read-only
access to the instance zodb to read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29 May 2006, at 16:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you setup drbd and heartbeat , the spare will take over the
floating ip from the zeo server and restart the service. drbd is
simply doing a block level replication of the zeo server file
sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29 May 2006, at 16:45, Christian Theune wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks, I'm looking at making a scalable zope infrastructure, I
can scale the ZEO clients and mysql, the only issue is the ZEO
server. I have used drbd and heartbeat i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 May 2006, at 16:43, Benji York wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
You could use a firewall to allow incoming ZEO connection only
from authorized IP address...should not be more than some lines of
iptables configuration or so.
Similarly, you can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 May 2006, at 13:30, David Pratt wrote:
I don't know anyone who uses authenticated ZEO connections, does
it even work? IMHO most people are in a situation where the
traffic between the ZEO clients and the ZEO server runs on an
internal net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 May 2006, at 05:46, David Pratt wrote:
I am curious how folks are handling authentication for ZEO in a
general way (client against the server). Is is common to attempt to
use user/passwords from acl in zope as a means of creating a lists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5 May 2006, at 02:57, David Pratt wrote:
Hi Jim and Roderigo! This is encouraging news. I have been putting
much thought into this also. There is a downside to refactoring ZEO
in that there are many folks heavily dependent on it and also
re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2 May 2006, at 13:33, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Oh, well, now that's an obviously named key *grumble* *grumble*
Any recent zope has this in its default zope.conf:
Come on, you know Chris *never* takes the "attempt to look something
up myself
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Apr 2006, at 09:01, Thomas Guettler wrote:
I think it is a bug.
If you think there is a bug please use the collector:
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope
Email gets lost and forgotten, it is unsuitable for reporting bugs.
jens
-BEGI
Wherever I run ZEO I would never enable the persistent cache. It has
always tended to create more problems than it solves.
I think a lot of people don't realize that the "persistent" of
"persistent cache" only means "survives across ZEO client restarts",
not "enable the ZEO cache". The ZEO
On 2 Mar 2006, at 17:28, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Hi there,
I'm facing an issue with a ConflictError that won't go away even after
restarting. Looks like the ZODB got screwed somehow. Here's the
traceback:
Have you read this document and tried some of the tools mentioned here?
http://www.zo
o You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
From: Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 26 February 2006 10:33:39 GMT+01:00
To: zodb-dev
Subject: Re: [ZODB-Dev] how to let java applet using mysql database
work in zope/plone?
On
On 26 Feb 2006, at 09:51, LonLon wrote:
Hello!
Currently, I am trying to integrate one java applet to plone CMS.
However, since my applet use mysql database, the applet from plone/
zope can't get the mysql data from localhost. Can we store mysql
data inside ZODB ? Or what is the ways to ge
On 25 Jan 2006, at 09:49, Rene Pijlman wrote:
Option 3:
Use separate Python installations for Zope and the application.
Install ZODB in the application's Python installation, not in
Zope's.
This is the only sane option.
jens
___
For more informatio
On 9 Jan 2006, at 21:21, Ammar Hakim wrote:
Sometimes, in the last step the browser still gets the
old data before the change was made. On a refresh,
however, the correct data is obtained. Further, this
problem does not always crop up: it seems that it
occurs if the particual DB operation is ver
On 11 Dec 2005, at 16:35, Jim Fulton wrote:
Tim Peters wrote:
[Jens Vagelpohl]
Just as a heads-up because I don't know how much testing ever
gets done
on OS X:
I do: none ;-)
Can someone volunteer to run a Mac OS X buildbot slave? If not,
I'll try to set up an *old* iMac th
Just as a heads-up because I don't know how much testing ever gets
done on OS X: Running the tests on the current ZODB trunk using a
self.built Python 2.4.2 on OS X (10.4.3) the following test fails:
Failure in test test_must_use_consistent_connections
(
On 23 Nov 2005, at 17:28, Dirksen Lau wrote:
On 11/23/05, Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 23 Nov 2005, at 17:06, Dirksen Lau wrote:
1. Open the ZMI of the root;
2. Create one object of whatever type (such as a DTML method);
3. Keep refreshing the browser. 4 out of 10 t
On 23 Nov 2005, at 17:06, Dirksen Lau wrote:
1. Open the ZMI of the root;
2. Create one object of whatever type (such as a DTML method);
3. Keep refreshing the browser. 4 out of 10 the new object disappears
from the folder content list! If I surf dirrectly to the object, such
as localhost/foo, I
Imagine if somebody tried to use ZPTs, and the answer to any question
where you get errors from it is "well, then don't use it?" It's just
not a viable answer.
Refresh is not a core functionality like ZPT. That comparison is a
bit outlandish.
If it is the majoritys agreement that this answ
On 12 Jul 2005, at 18:17, Lennart Regebro wrote:
previous Zope version, which I used, was 2.6.1, but it was very old
version and
I decided to jump to 2.8.0. I took problems with autorefresh. What
can I do to solve
my problems?
If it creates problems then simply don't use it.
That's not a
On 12 Jul 2005, at 13:17, Victor Safronovich wrote:
previous Zope version, which I used, was 2.6.1, but it was very old
version and
I decided to jump to 2.8.0. I took problems with autorefresh. What
can I do to solve
my problems?
If it creates problems then simply don't use it.
jens
__
On 2 Jul 2005, at 01:37, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:38:48PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
| > Any suggestions about how to best implement this,
|
| Maybe just create your own socket, attempt to connect, and if
that attempt
| fails produce the kind of error message you want t
45 matches
Mail list logo
