Hi,
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Stefan H. Holek wrote:
We have put up two boxes in a MySQL master-master replication setup
[1]. As long as we only write to one of the masters all is fine.
Writing to both masters (and expecting MySQL to sort it out) is
giving us trouble. We see things like:
Stefan H. Holek wrote:
I am playing with database replication (MySQL) and have found the
following caveats:
- don't mix engine types (MyISAM, InnoDB)
- don't use temporary tables
Now, RelStorage does both and so I was wondering how to proceed with
replication. Would it be prudent to
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2007, 01:42 -0800 schrieb Tarek Ziadé:
Hi,
I am working on a project that needs to do mass hosting of zope sites. I
would like to have several site per zope instance, and to make a zodb mount
point for each new site created to ease their
Sebastian Wehrmann schrieb:
Am 4. September 2007, 16:17:27 Uhr schrieb Jim Fulton:
I would very much like to see an open indexing+querying framework for
Python objects. I'm thinking of something *like* an SQL engine that
allowed one to plug in relation and index implementations and that
Christian Theune schrieb:
Am Mittwoch, den 05.09.2007, 09:24 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
I'd like to see a generic framework for defining collections and
indexes in Python and querying them efficiently. No ZODB expertise
should be needed,
I have the feeling you already pondered this a bit
Dieter Maurer schrieb:
Jim Fulton wrote at 2007-5-4 14:40 -0400:
On May 4, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote at 2007-5-2 11:52 -0400:
...
I think I still rather like explicit, but I'm on the fence about
which approach is best. What do other people think?
From your
Stefan H. Holek schrieb:
Do we have a history-less (i.e. no-grow) FileStorage?
How do you think it should work? I mean, technically
in theory? How would you implement MVCC?
Regards
Tino
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
Stefan H. Holek schrieb:
Hi all,
The ExtFile product I maintain keeps its payload on the filesystem. All
operations are performed using temporary files which are then saved or
deleted on transaction commit or abort respectively.
Do you remember, when you use the tempfile module, you get
LonLon schrieb:
Thanks for your suggestion jens, but my java applet is working outside
zope, it has no problem with mySQL database. Only when I integrate my
applet into zope, it can not take mySQL data anymore. That's why I
request suggestions here. I am still hoping somebody knows how to fix
José Carlos Senciales schrieb:
thanks
How can i know if i have my Python configured with large file support ?
My version is:
Zope Version (Zope 2.8.4-final, python 2.3.5, win32)
Python Version 2.3.5 (#62, Feb 8 2005, 16:23:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit
(Intel)]
System Platform win32
José Carlos Senciales schrieb:
thanks
my phyton console return 0L, so i have have large file support.
So if you still experience problems with files 2GB, you might
move to another filesystem (if moving to another OS is not an
option ;)
___
For
tav schrieb:
Why is it significantly easier to protect the key[s]
used for the encryption than the storage itself?
one could always passphrase-protect the key, i.e. use symmetric encryption.
admittedly, this could potentially be brute-forced, but ... should be
good enough for most
Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 18:09 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton:
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 08:03 +0200 schrieb Andreas Jung:
--On 13. Oktober 2005 01:45:30 -0400 Chris Spencer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that if a ZEOServer client doesn't have
Am Donnerstag, den 02.06.2005, 19:28 +0200 schrieb Dieter Maurer:
Currently, the ZODB cache can only be controlled via the maximal number
of objects. This makes configuration complex as the actual limiting
factor is the amount of available RAM and it is very difficult to
estimate the size of
14 matches
Mail list logo
