[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What does the "netmasks" entry in /etc/nsswitch.conf say? A common
> issue is that a user changes their local /etc/netmasks file but their
> the switch says to use something like "nis".
Bingo! Thanks!
>> (I also tried 172.20.0.0 on the theory that maybe it wanted me t
Thank you to everyone who replied so quickly...
Basically the inherit-pkg-dir's are by default.
Thanks,
David
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
> zoneadm: zone 'int-sagent-1-z1': WARNING: bge0:1: no matching subnet
> found in netmasks(4) for 172.20.46.188; using default of 255.255.0.0.
>
> but my /etc/netmasks (on both the global and local zone) looks good:
What does the "netmasks" entry in /etc/nsswitch.conf say? A common
issue is that
I'm getting an error on trying to create a second zone.
-bash-3.00# zonecfg -z test123 -f test123-zone-cmd.txt
On line 7 of test123-zone-cmd.txt:
An inherit-pkg-dir resource with the dir '/lib' already exists.
resource specification incomplete
Zone test123 failed to verify
test123: Insufficient s
Antonello Cruz wrote:
> I would definitely run
>
> zonecfg -z int-sagent-1-z1 info
>
> to check what the zone thinks is the netmask.
Doesn't display a netmask.
> I suspect if you haven't defined the '/24' it will pick the default for
> the address class. In this case, '/16' IIRC.
> Sometimes d
David Smith wrote:
> I'm getting an error on trying to create a second zone.
>
> -bash-3.00# zonecfg -z test123 -f test123-zone-cmd.txt
> On line 7 of test123-zone-cmd.txt:
> An inherit-pkg-dir resource with the dir '/lib' already exists.
> resource specification incomplete
> Zone test123 failed t
David Smith wrote:
> I'm getting an error on trying to create a second zone.
>
> -bash-3.00# zonecfg -z test123 -f test123-zone-cmd.txt
> On line 7 of test123-zone-cmd.txt:
> An inherit-pkg-dir resource with the dir '/lib' already exists.
> resource specification incomplete
> Zone test123 failed
I would definitely run
zonecfg -z int-sagent-1-z1 info
to check what the zone thinks is the netmask.
I suspect if you haven't defined the '/24' it will pick the default for
the address class. In this case, '/16' IIRC.
Sometimes documentation gets old...
Antonello
Jordan Brown (Sun) wrote:
> An
Antonello Cruz wrote:
>> zoneadm: zone 'int-sagent-1-z1': WARNING: bge0:1: no matching subnet
>> found in netmasks(4) for 172.20.46.188; using default of 255.255.0.0.
> How did you setup the IP address for that zone?
>
> Did you use, in zonecfg:
> zonecfg:int-sagent-1-z1:net> set address=172.20.4
On (11/30/07 08:25), Mike Gerdts wrote:
> The 10.1.1.100 address must not be reachable. The last time I tried
> this in Nevada it causes a panic. The last time I tried it on S10 it
> causes one kernel thread to spin (mpstat will show one CPU at 100%
> sys).
>
> Through bugs.opensolaris.org I ope
Hi Paul,
1. Clone them localy
2. Detach the Cloned Zones (zoneadm -z zonename detach)
3. Tar or pax them over starting from the zonepath and remote copy
the tarballs or simply export/import SAN DG hosting the zones.
4. Prepare them for attachment, zonecfg -z zonename and at prompt >
This was the problem. Thanks to Richard Lowe and Enda Oconnor for getting me on
the right track and pointing me to the workaround.
-Original Message-
>From: Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Nov 29, 2007 11:38 AM
>To: Mangan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
>Su
On Nov 30, 2007 7:37 AM, Paul Van Der Zwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Host 1:
> global zone bge0 192.168.1.1/24
> vni0 10.1.1.254/24
> zone1 vni1 10.1.1.1/24
> zone2 vni2 10.1.1.2/24
> zone3 vni3 10.1.1.3/24
When you try this configuration, go i
Need recommendation to determine the best way for replicating Solaris
Containers. Here is the situation:
(1) We built 4 containers for a customer on 2 different physical hosts.
Root file systems are shared.
(2) Customer installed all their applications, packages etc.
Now customer wan
I am wondering if the following setup on S10u4 with local zones will work, or
can be made to work.
The setup is meant be used as a backend for a loadbalancer which uses the
direct-return method,
that is, no NAT but the balanced service talks directly to the client.
In all zones running a service
Jordan,
How did you setup the IP address for that zone?
Did you use, in zonecfg:
zonecfg:int-sagent-1-z1:net> set address=172.20.46.188/24
?
Antonello
Jordan Brown (Sun) wrote:
> I get:
>
> zoneadm: zone 'int-sagent-1-z1': WARNING: bge0:1: no matching subnet
> found in netmasks(4) for 172.20.
16 matches
Mail list logo