IMHO, since I or i do not know what is the effort for making zone NFS
server
since many many many user will be using s10 for some time, this is nice
feature to have
Sinc CIFS/SMB only happen in s11 so porting to s10 will be big job
But zone is in S10 since 2005 and ther are always new feature
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
> But adding sbm server support to a zone isn't a backport, it's a new
> innovative feature!
It's a backport if you want it in S10.
> I'm sure we aren't the only site who has consolidated older fileservers into
> zones and would like to use nat
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> So us S11.
s/us/use/
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 09/30/11 09:45 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Jeff Victor wrote:
The general rule is "convince product management that there is a business
reason to invest the engineer(s) and it will get done."
IMO, for backports, the bar should be much higher. The vendor shoul
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Jeff Victor wrote:
> The general rule is "convince product management that there is a business
> reason to invest the engineer(s) and it will get done."
IMO, for backports, the bar should be much higher. The vendor should
compute the cost of the backport *includi
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 09/30/11 03:01 AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:57:12PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/29/11 09:50 AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
>>>
nfs server is now supported in a zone on s11.
smb server is
On 09/30/11 03:01 AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:57:12PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
On 09/29/11 09:50 AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
nfs server is now supported in a zone on s11.
smb server is not.
OK, thanks Ed.
I thought the original ARC case for PRIV_SYS_SHARE woul
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:53 AM, hung-sheng tsao wrote:
> Why only in s11?
You probably have no idea how expensive a backport is. Not only does
it require a fair bit of labor by talented engineers, it had an
enormous cost of opportunity for the vendor: those engineers' talents
are wasted on a p
because s10 is (or was) our primary development release and we don't
backport every feature to s10/s9/s8/etc.
ed
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:53:34AM -0400, hung-sheng tsao wrote:
> Why only in s11?
>
> On 9/28/11, Ian Collins wrote:
> > On 09/29/11 09:50 AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
> >> nfs s
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:57:12PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 09/29/11 09:50 AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
> >nfs server is now supported in a zone on s11.
> >smb server is not.
>
> OK, thanks Ed.
>
> I thought the original ARC case for PRIV_SYS_SHARE would have enabled both?
>
it's not just a
Why only in s11?
On 9/28/11, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 09/29/11 09:50 AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
>> nfs server is now supported in a zone on s11.
>> smb server is not.
>
> OK, thanks Ed.
>
> I thought the original ARC case for PRIV_SYS_SHARE would have enabled both?
>
> --
> Ian.
>
> _
11 matches
Mail list logo