When Sol10u4 comes out, I intend to move my non-global zones to exclusive IP
instances so that I can route traffic through my NAT from the outside more
easily (don't ask!). I do have a question, however. Say I have a machine with
one physical link, e1000g0, which has non-global zones on three
When Sol10u4 comes out, I intend to move my non-global zones to exclusive IP
instances so that I can route traffic through my NAT from the outside more
easily (don't ask!). I do have a question, however. Say I have a machine with
one physical link, e1000g0, which has non-global zones on three
When Sol10u4 comes out, I intend to move my non-global zones to exclusive IP
instances so that I can route traffic through my NAT from the outside more
easily (don't ask!). I do have a question, however. Say I have a machine with
one physical link, e1000g0, which has non-global zones on three
When Sol10u4 comes out, I intend to move my non-global zones to exclusive IP
instances so that I can route traffic through my NAT from the outside more
easily (don't ask!). I do have a question, however. Say I have a machine with
one physical link, e1000g0, which has non-global zones on three
When Sol10u4 comes out, I intend to move my non-global zones to exclusive IP
instances so that I can route traffic through my NAT from the outside more
easily (don't ask!). I do have a question, however. Say I have a machine with
one physical link, e1000g0, which has non-global zones on three
When Sol10u4 comes out, I intend to move my non-global zones to exclusive IP
instances so that I can route traffic through my NAT from the outside more
easily (don't ask!). I do have a question, however. Say I have a machine with
one physical link, e1000g0, which has non-global zones on three
Steffen,
I've just ordered an intel NIC (hopefully it plays happy). Once update 4 comes
out, I'll see what I can figure out. The IP NAT in question is not Solaris;
it's Cisco, and it works 100% fine in my tests (verified by others who know
more about cisco kit than I). It will be interesting t
It almost looks like Crossbow's vnic idea may help me, but from what I can tell
that does me no good since I'm running Solaris 10. (this is production, of
sorts, so I'll keep it running s10 rather than SXCE.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
I have an interesting issue with NAT translations (from my cisco router) to
some local zones on my solaris box (running s10 patched relatively current).
The global zone is on 172.20.1.32/27 as are a few of the non-global zones on
this host. Other non-global zones are on 172.20.1.64/27 which in
