On 13 dec 2010, at 10:50, Ketan wrote:
> Ok got it .. but still if i want to check what's current usage by a whole
> zone/project for locked-memory what would be the best way .. i 'm using
>
> kstat -c project_caps -n 'lockedmem*'
That should work, I have used it without problem and the "zon
Hello Ketan,
On Dec 13, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Ketan wrote:
> One of our box T5440 has been configured with 5 zones and following resource
> management parameters has been applied to 1 zone say zone1
>
> zone.max-shm-memory 4G
> zone.max-locked-memory 4G
>
> so if i want to check the zone.max
On Nov 3, 2010, at 1:22 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2010, at 12:06 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/ 3/10 11:56 AM, Henrik Johansson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would ideally like to do two things:
>>>>
>>>&g
Hello Ian,
Thanks four your answer, more below.
On Nov 3, 2010, at 12:06 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 11/ 3/10 11:56 AM, Henrik Johansson wrote:
>>
>>
>> I would ideally like to do two things:
>>
>> 1. Have all filesystem configuration for the zone in the po
Hi all,
I would like you take on this for a large zone installation.
I am going to create zones on zpools with a pool for the zoneroot and another
pool for for application data, the second pool can differ in layout, disk
system and properties and can easily be separated from the zone and moved
On 17 mar 2010, at 04.12, Derek McEachern
wrote:
Thanks for the responses.
We don't plan on running the zone root on vxfs, it will be on ufs.
The VRTSvfxs package installs with parameters
SUNW_PKG_ALLZONES='true'
SUNW_PKG_HOLLOW='true'
SUNW_PKG_THISZONE='false'
so package content is not de
I am away from home and om mobie device so i'll make it short.
This work fine if you don't ever put the zoneroot on vxfs, if you do
you will not be able to use all upgrade options and the Veritas
supplied scripts for live upgrade only works with a vanilla install
(no separate LUN for zones
Hi all,
If anyone is interested or have comments.
I did a very quick test with zones on a deduped zpool and the footprint seems
quite low, a little over 10MB per zone after the initial for OSOL default
installed zone.
http://sparcv9.blogspot.com/2009/11/dedupliation-with-zones.html
(I know th
Hello Michael,
On Aug 19, 2009, at 7:17 PM, Michael Barrett wrote:
Say you create a zpool based on a file that lives on a NFS mount.
Then you mount that zpool to a local mount point and give it to your
zone to live on. I'm assuming that under the covers this is just
another version of th
d any
hypervisor based solution for systems with heavy workloads.
http://www.playingwithwire.com/2009/06/virtual-failure-yippiemove-switches-from-vmware-to-freebsd-jails/
Henrik Johansson
http://sparcv9.blogspot.com
___
zones-discuss mailing list
Nice work Jeff!
Some thoughts:
Would not 1024 be bettet suited than 1000 for shorten? Currently if I
set a swap capping with zonecfg to 256G it is displayed as 275G in
zonestat.
It would be nice to check for patch 127127-11, 137137-09 etc instead
of looking at /etc/release since the syst
ris 10
instead, it was included in 10/08.
Regards
Henrik Johansson
http://sparcv9.blogspot.com
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
in.
It's late here in Sweden but i can give you the exact information on
what I experienced and how it was solved tomorrow morning if it's of
any interest.
Regards
Henrik Johansson
http://sparcv9.blogspot.com
___
zones-discuss mailin
On 6 nov 2008, at 15.16, Jerry Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henrik Johansson wrote:
>> The easiest way would probably be to identify packages that are not
>> to be updated, in my experience packages do not differ that much
>> between local zones in p
On Nov 6, 2008, at 12:47 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
> I think that just updating the non-global zone for every pkg
> that is installed in the global is probably not quite right since
> you want to be able to have different software in different zones,
> including the global zone.
Upgrade is alread
Hi all,
Some thoughts regarding update on attach, and why I don't think it
will be as useful as it could be. Perhaps Jerry or someone could
enlighten me or give me some feedback.
This mainly applies to whole root zones, since they do not have any
inherited package directories.
The update t
On Jun 29, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Enda O'Connor wrote:
> Hi
> When was this, or to be precise what rev of patch utils was
> installed,119254/11955 SPARC/x86.
>
> Patching zones on zfs is supported at this point.
> Did you report this, what errors did you see etc.
>
> The original doc mentioned patch a
On Jun 25, 2008, at 2:04 PM, James Carlson wrote:
>
> If you need information on S10 updates, you should contact your local
> support folks. S10 updates aren't OpenSolaris, so there's no reason
> to discuss their schedules or content here, and there's no necessary
> relationship between features
Any word if we will get any of these features/fix in S10U6, it would
make life with zones quite a bit easier...
Zone update on attach (PSARC/2007/621)
Attach/dettach between sun4u and sun4v (6480464)
Vanity naming (PSARC 2006/499)
6637869 zone attach doesn't handle obsolete patches correctly
Re
On May 27, 2008, at 11:54 PM, Crambit Team wrote:
> Hi,
> I meant to boot over the net a zonelikne boot net - install
> but you can't because you don't have OBP at that level
> Must be a flag into the zonecfg command or zoneadm.
Zones are not separate Solaris instances, they are cr
Hello Team!
On May 25, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Crambit Team wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> does anyone know how to jumpstart a new zone over net? Is there a
> kind of flag to set when you create a zone?
JetZONES should handle zone related tasks in Jet, it is included in
the Jet package available on sun.co
Hello Sanjay,
On Apr 16, 2008, at 11:57 PM, Sanjay Akula wrote:
> Can any one tell me how LDoms works? Does this is an independent OS
> on each zones or it is dependent on Global zone?
>
> I'm new to LDoms.
LDOMS is not related to the zones other that that it is another way of
virtualization
22 matches
Mail list logo
