+1
I put it up on a cluster under hbase and ran loads against it over
last few hours. Nothing untoward in logs. Played around w/ zkcli.
It seems to behaving same as 3.3.1.
St.Ack
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> +1
>
> Python looks good.
>
> On 10 November 2010 14:51,
+1
I installed it under hbase cluster as a 5-node ensemble. Looks like
it works like 3.3.0. Did some messing sending nc commands. No prob.
St.Ack
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
> +1.
>
> Ran ant tests and some manual testing to bring up a cluster and run manual
> comma
at's just not acceptable.
>
> The roadmap has some detail on this, but it's out of date from our current
> practices. We also need to include this information in our release notes.
> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/Roadmap
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKE
ssion:0x0
NIOServerCnxn: java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected
local=/10.20.20.166:2181 remote=/10.20.20.185:60661]
...
If I do stat over there I see Zookeeper version: 3.2.2-888565, built
on 12/08/2009 21:51 GMT...
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Stack, you can
+1
All hbase tests pass with 3.3.0 in place. I ran small loading and
nothing odd looking. Looks like no issue having a zk 3.3.0 client
talk to a 3.2.2 ensemble.
Requires small mods to hbase other than dropping new zk jar into
hbase/lib in place of zk 3.2.2: HBASE-2380.
St.Ack
On Fri, Mar 19,
+1
Put it under hbase and ran a loading on a small cluster. Completed.
Checked out doc. Looks right on cursory glance.
St.Ack
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.2.2. This is a bug
> fix release addressing 13 issues (t
: Improvement
Reporter: stack
I'd like to ask a running quorum what its configuration is. I'd want to know
stuff like session timeout and tick times.
Use case is that in hbase there is no zoo.cfg usually; the configuration is
manufactured and piped to the starting zk server. I wa
+1 Ran it in place of zk-3.2.1 in hbase context for an upload and nothing
untoward examining logs. Took a quick gander at the doc. and nothing
obviously amiss.
St.Ack
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Hadoop PMC,
>
> Please test and vote on this release in zookeeper-dev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781074#action_12781074
]
stack commented on ZOOKEEPER-587:
-
If server changes the timeout on the client,
(I sent below to general and private -- should have sent it to zookeeper-dev
too)
-- Forwarded message --
From: stack
Date: Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.2.1 (candidate 0)]]
To: gene...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: priv
10 matches
Mail list logo
