Re: Contrib section (nee Re: A modest proposal for simplifying zookeeper :)

2009-02-27 Thread Benjamin Reed
just to be clear: i'm not a maven fan, but i'm not sure anything else is better. buildr looks better flexibility wise, but i think maven is much more popular and mature. with ivy we are still stuck with ant build files. ben Patrick Hunt wrote: Ben, you might want to look at buildr, it recently

Re: Contrib section (nee Re: A modest proposal for simplifying zookeeper :)

2009-02-27 Thread Patrick Hunt
Ben, you might want to look at buildr, it recently graduated from the apache incubator: http://buildr.apache.org/ "Buildr is a build system for Java applications. We wanted something that’s simple and intuitive to use, so we only need to tell it what to do, and it takes care of the rest. But a

Re: Contrib section (nee Re: A modest proposal for simplifying zookeeper :)

2009-02-27 Thread Benjamin Reed
i'm ready to reevaluate it. i did the contrib for fatjar and it was extremely painful! (and that was an extremely simple contrib!) we really want to ramp up the contribs and get a bunch of recipe implementations in, so we need something that makes it really easy. i'm not a fan of maven (they se

Re: Contrib section (nee Re: A modest proposal for simplifying zookeeper :)

2009-02-27 Thread Patrick Hunt
Hi Anthony. We have a contrib in the current release, it's under src. I'm not sure I understand, what is "contrib section" referring to? Or do you mean client recipe implementations? (like ZOOKEEPER-78, which is being worked on for 3.2) Patrick Anthony Urso wrote: So does this mean no contri

Re: Contrib section (nee Re: A modest proposal for simplifying zookeeper :)

2009-02-26 Thread Anthony Urso
So does this mean no contrib section? On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > So far we've stayed with the process used by core as this minimizes the > amount of work we need to do re process/build/release, etc... we just copy > the process/build/release etc... used in core, we ge

Re: Contrib section (nee Re: A modest proposal for simplifying zookeeper :)

2009-02-26 Thread Patrick Hunt
So far we've stayed with the process used by core as this minimizes the amount of work we need to do re process/build/release, etc... we just copy the process/build/release etc... used in core, we get all that for free. I'm hesitant to diverge as this will increase the amount of work we need to

Contrib section (nee Re: A modest proposal for simplifying zookeeper :)

2009-02-26 Thread Anthony Urso
Speaking of the contrib section, what is the status of ZOOKEEPER-103? Is it ready to be reevaluated now that 3.0 is out? Cheers, Anthony On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > Hi Kevin, >  It would be great to have such high level interfaces. It could be > something that you cou