On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 10:40:53AM +0200, Martijn Pieters wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 06:31:36PM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> >
> > *grumble* I'm sure I saw a post to slashdot saying M17 was out...
> > yep, I did,
> > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/06/26/1655250&mode=nested
> >
>
Martijn Pieters wrote:
> Slashdot has the journalistic integrity of a cod fish. One of the replies on
> the page scolds the writer for _another_ mistake about this. Personally, I
> have given up on slashdot.
around this part of town, we refer to it as "slash and burn". :)
jake
**
__
Anthony Baxter wrote:
>
> The basic auth problem of mozilla-on-linux that's been around since
> around the 1st or 2nd of June are now fixed, as of 2000-06-27-20-M17
> (note that I don't believe that straight M17 has the fixes applied.)
There is no M17 official release. We still do nightly build
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 06:31:36PM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> >>> Martijn Pieters wrote
> > Don't you mean M16? When M17 comes out it will have the fix. Nightlies are
> > marked with the milestone they are working up _to_, not what they are working
> > _from_.
>
> *grumble* I'm sure I saw a p
>>> Martijn Pieters wrote
> Don't you mean M16? When M17 comes out it will have the fix. Nightlies are
> marked with the milestone they are working up _to_, not what they are working
> _from_.
*grumble* I'm sure I saw a post to slashdot saying M17 was out...
yep, I did,
http://slashdot.org/artic
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 05:07:26PM +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> The basic auth problem of mozilla-on-linux that's been around since
> around the 1st or 2nd of June are now fixed, as of 2000-06-27-20-M17
> (note that I don't believe that straight M17 has the fixes applied.)
Don't you mean M16? W
