[Zope-CMF] Re: Re: The components of Archetypes

2006-01-11 Thread Martin Aspeli
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:16:11 -, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Additionally, I think sometimes doing some of 1 can be beneficial to 2. In particular, it may be worthwhile to start supporting Z3 widgets in Archetypes (I read somewhere that plone_schema makes this possible a

[Zope-CMF] CMF Collector: Open Issues

2006-01-11 Thread tseaver
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector (http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF). Assigned and Open efge - "CMFSetup: provide non-ascii im- and exports", [Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/292 jens - "Discussion replies removal",

[Zope-CMF] [dev] status of events support?

2006-01-11 Thread yuppie
Hi! What's the current status of the events support? 1.) AFAICS the efge-1.5-five-compatible branch is only merged into the 1.6 branch. IIRC there were no plans to merge this into the 1.5 branch because these changes are not 100% backwards compatible. That means that CMF 1.5 should not be us

[Zope-CMF] CMF 2.0 Release Status

2006-01-11 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 First, many thanks to all who have contributed toe the CMF 2.0 effort! I'd like to review the current status of a number of the CMF 2.0 roadmap items, and ask for feedback from the community on how they fit into a near-term release of a beta for CMF 2

[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] status of events support?

2006-01-11 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yuppie wrote: > Hi! > > > What's the current status of the events support? > > 1.) AFAICS the efge-1.5-five-compatible branch is only merged into the > 1.6 branch. IIRC there were no plans to merge this into the 1.5 branch > because these changes ar

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF 2.0 Release Status

2006-01-11 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
On 11 Jan 2006, at 18:42, Tres Seaver wrote: I have "posted a blog entry,", http://palladion.com/home/tseaver/obzervationz/2006/ cmf_2_0_update_20060111 summarizing what I think is the current status of the project. Please comment here on ths list, correcting my mistakes or omissions, as wel

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF 2.0 Release Status

2006-01-11 Thread Lennart Regebro
Right, the five_actions tool is still completely borked. CMFonFive 1.3 has the correct one, and today I checked in a fix there, so I think it's stabilizing now. I'll copy the CMFonFive 1.3 stuff into CMF 2.0. ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.

Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF 2.0 Release Status

2006-01-11 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 1/11/06, Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right, the five_actions tool is still completely borked. CMFonFive 1.3 > has the correct one, and today I checked in a fix there, so I think > it's stabilizing now. I'll copy the CMFonFive 1.3 stuff into CMF 2.0. ...this week, I meant to say

[Zope-CMF] Re: CMF 2.0 Release Status

2006-01-11 Thread Alexander Limi
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:00:18 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This ties into the second question, which Plone core developers can answer better, about the plans for which version of Plone will go with which version of CMF. Plone 2.5 (the next release, due this spring) wil