aillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
y own code. Side effects should be more visible.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/ma
_
Zope-CMF maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n/zope/traversing/adapters.py", line
161, in traversePathElement
raise TraversalError('No traversable adapter found', obj)
TraversalError: ('No traversable adapter found', {'state_variable':
'state', 'state_info': [...], ...})
Does anyone have an i
ot;CMF
customers". There's no sense following a strict time-based policy that
is currently out of sync with what the "customers" want/need.
jens
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hipped with CMF 1.6.1 final to the current GenericSetup trunk. The
registerProfile ZCML directive is a pure addition and no existing
functionality has been changed as far as I can see. Furthermore, all
tests run fine, whatever that means ;)
Cool, thanks, that will be useful.
Flornet
--
Florent G
n Zope 2.8.
1.6 is a "stepping-stone" for projects which needed the new GenericSetup
features, but couldn't move all the way to CMF 2.0; making it less
noisy under 2.10 has to give precedence to preserving BBB.
Sure, I keep that in mind.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo
yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Is it ok if I change CMF 1.6 (currently in beta) to use the logging
module instead of zLOG?
zLOG spouts lots of warnings under Zope 2.10 and this sucks.
+1 if you forward port the fixes ;)
(see http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/439)
Done.
Florent
sent the result mainly because of the BLATHER/TRACE/DEBUG-to-debug
impedance mismatch)
Well you're better off patching zLOG then, to make it not send the
warning :)
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com
table" platform for them.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
Is it ok if I change CMF 1.6 (currently in beta) to use the logging
module instead of zLOG?
zLOG spouts lots of warnings under Zope 2.10 and this sucks.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTE
nto
account everywhere, although it should.
CPS 4 will be purely unicode, and won't need all that shit.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
intenance release to CMF 1.6.1 if nothing breaks with it.
CPS 4, scheduled for September, will use CMF 2.0 (and Zope 2.10).
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
itions, is there?
No there isn't yet, but that's the next logical step in event conversion
in CMF. Would you like to work on that? It should be quite simple.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxe
ailman/listinfo/zope-cvs
Or are these checkins messages now going somewhere else?
Thanks,
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope
it in real life:
>>> def f(a):
... print a+1
>>> def g(b):
... print b+2
>>> f(0)
1
>>> f.func_code = g.func_code
>>> f(0)
2
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com
On 2 Jun 2006, at 09:00, yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Sorry to beat a dead horse, but can't we have "cmf" as a domain
everywhere and be done with it? There's really no point in
separating cmf_default from cmf_somethingelse.
The point is to use CMFCalendar
espaces.zope.org/five";
-i18n_domain="cmf"
->
+i18n_domain="cmf_default">
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
d say rip them out and don't bother with
deprecation warnings. Seeing that we, core CMF developers, haven't really
supported them for ages, continuing the illusion that they're maintained is
useless.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
ly experiment to "show the way", I'm pretty sure
Tres's work obsoletes it.
Florent
Would it make sense to prevent this branch from being left behind more
as "normal" development continues by merging it into the trunk and
continuing the remaining polishing there?
-
UID management.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://c
#x27;t use the content.py I/O
export methods. The XML/NodeAdapterBase is enough for us.
But I'm curious as to why there are two import/export frameworks, the config
one (NodeAdapterBase) and the content one (FileSystemExporter). Couldn't
they be merged? Or at least some adapters reus
yuppie wrote:
Hi Rob!
Rob Miller wrote:
i'm picking up a thread from january that sort of petered out...
yuppie wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Because the "current base profile id" is not stored, there's no way to
do detect the change to a di
4.) Change the browser view templates to use 'main' instead of 'body'
(that no longer maps to 'main').
Any feedback is welcome. If there are no objections I'd like to make the
proposed changes on Saturday, before the 2.0-beta2 release.
Cheers,
Yu
A few versions of CMF have been tagged, but the tags still have an
svn:external pointing to GenericSetup trunk. That's bad as it means the tag
checkout will change over time.
GenericSetup should be tagged too, and the CMF tags point to it.
(I favor the first solution.)
Florent
--
Fl
*like* something to
happen, but this was a question directed at the people who *do* make it
happen. If we're not sticking to some kind of schedule but wait till all
wish lists are considered we won't get anywhere I am afraid.
I'd love to help but I won't have much bandwid
27;UseMailHost' permissions).
-method = getattr(self, 'member_registered_mail',
- getattr(self, 'registered_notify_template'))
+method = getattr(self, 'member_registered_mail')
kw = {'member': member, 'pas
to
events, so are still flagged using five:deprecatedManageAddDelete.
As mentioned, Tres has a branch where he works on this.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
stTypeInfo return also non-persistent TI objects
corresponding to those registered through ZCML.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist -
s" but that's
another story).
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listin
On 1 Feb 2006, at 20:45, yuppie wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 1 Feb 2006, at 17:30, Florent Guillaume wrote:
When you select a new base profile in the Properties tab, the
toolset
and import/export steps are not reset but simply updated. This
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 1 Feb 2006, at 17:30, Florent Guillaume wrote:
When you select a new base profile in the Properties tab, the toolset
and import/export steps are not reset but simply updated. This means
you can get steps unrelated to your profile that linger.
I'd like to c
ofile is selected.
Comments?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
eTraverse.unregisterBeforeTraverse(event.newParent, handle)
I think you want event.oldParent here.
Florent
+
class ResponseCleanup:
def __init__(self, resp):
self.resp = resp
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+
On 31 Jan 2006, at 14:10, yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Some checkin messages are missing from the checkins list.
For instance r41445 by Yuppie is not there.
This makes it hard to follow developments...
This is a GenericSetup checkin and can be found on zope-cvs
Some checkin messages are missing from the checkins list.
For instance r41445 by Yuppie is not there.
This makes it hard to follow developments...
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTE
If you modify an xml profile on the filesystem and one of the '~'
backup files made by your editor contains invalid XML, on import you
get:
ExpatError: not well-formed (invalid token)
Is it ok if modify context.listDirectory to skip files ending in '~'?
Florent
--
Flor
database documents and modify the portal_type of the former
PressReleases, and maybe adjust some attributes. That's what upgrade steps
are for in CPS.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 5
als, obviously.
Calling portal_workflow.setStatusOf(...) should be enough. You'll have
to pass a status dict containing at least {wf.state_var: state_id}, you
should also set the other variables your application expects.
Then update the security mappings by calling wf.updateRoleMappingsFor(ob).
Florent
--
F
Here is some doc I wrote about GenericSetup:
http://blogs.nuxeo.com/sections/blogs/florent_guillaume/2006_01_24_genericsetup-for-cps-cmf
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTE
t modification
events in 2.0; we won't get around to changing the infrastructure
pieces to be based on those events before a 2.0 release.
I'll provide some help there if needed.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director
On 20 Jan 2006, at 11:42, Encolpe Degoute wrote:
Florent Guillaume a écrit :
| Log message for revision 41380:
| Ignore _svn directories in addition to .svn (for Windows).
Hi,
Can you also add _darcs for ZWiki repository ?
Is that on windows? What about unix? Is it '.darcs'
Rob Miller wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
It seems that an extension profile can't add actions to an action
provide in CMF 1.6. Or, rather, if you do it all previous actions are
erased.
The actions exportimport code has:
def _initProviders(self,
n't purged correctly.
Can someone shed light on what the code tries to do? Can I use
"newstyle" action profiles in CMF 1.6?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
have code in hand which makes the catalog and
workflow tools subscribers, so that we could rip out the
'manage_afterAdd' and 'manage_beforeDelete' from the content base class?
No I haven't done that yet even in CPS (for lack of time, not because of
difficulty).
Florent
-
On 17 Jan 2006, at 10:28, yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I recently introduced the fact that in extension profiles list
properties aren't purged by default.
But really this introduces problems, as if you simply import an
extension profile twice you&#
Rocky Burt wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I propose to add a new directive "registerProfile" in GenericSetup so
that profile registration can be done through zcml.
What namespace should I use?
How about 'http://namespaces.zope.org/genericsetup'?
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I recently introduced the fact that in extension profiles list
properties aren't purged by default.
But really this introduces problems, as if you simply import an
extension profile twice you'll get all you lists doubled.
So I think I'll use the op
from outside Products (so that
they will still receive the same initialization features and an entry in
the Control_Panel, etc.).
Rocky how does your effort relate to Basket by the way? ISTR that Basket
aims at answering a similar use case.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France)
to what was the
case before: purge by default for lists even in extension profiles,
except if purge="False" is present on the property.
Opinions?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http:/
I propose to add a new directive "registerProfile" in GenericSetup so
that profile registration can be done through zcml.
What namespace should I use?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [E
Why is the membership tool folderish?
What's potentially stored in it?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists
s later or tomorrow.
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
Alexander Limi wrote:
Florent Guillaume:
That's been the intent of the code all along: when you query the
workflow tool and ask it for the state of an object, this is passed
along to DCWorkflow, and if the object doesn't have a state anymore
the initial state is returned.
Howe
ueries and recatalogs all the
objects, so they still have an old review_state in the catalog.
"Update security settings" is for a different use case, I'm not sure it
should be retrofitted into doing this.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France
document these update directives somewhere.
Originally all update directives were mentioned in CMFSetup/
PROFILES.txt. GenericSetup/PROFILES.txt no longer has a complete
list because most update directives are CMF specific.
I also agree, I need to point my developers to a doc somewhere with
On 4 Jan 2006, at 20:17, Florent Guillaume wrote:
On 13 Dec 2005, at 13:50, yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
On 13 Dec 2005, at 12:50, yuppie wrote:
I'd propose to implement an update mode for list properties and
to add an update file for each allowed container. Something
On 13 Dec 2005, at 13:50, yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
On 13 Dec 2005, at 12:50, yuppie wrote:
I'd propose to implement an update mode for list properties and
to add an update file for each allowed container. Something like
that:
(Didn't have a look at t
fferent ways of
filtering displayed content. Can you configurm that the bug applies to pure CMF?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF ma
-1,1 +1,0 @@
\n-GHIJKL'
.
Failure in test test_compare_removed_file_no_missing_as_empty
(Products.GenericSetup.tests.test_differ.ConfigDiffTests)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/fguillaume/zope/zope29-zope/lib/python/Testing/
ZopeTestCase/profiler.py", line 98, in _
Hi Yuppie!
On 29 Dec 2005, at 21:20, yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
On 27 Dec 2005, at 10:51, yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Also I'd like to change things like:
node = property(_exportNode, _importNode)
into:
def __exportNode(self):
return self._expor
On 27 Dec 2005, at 10:51, yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Here's a few things I'd like to change in GenericSetup's
management of properties (PropertyManagerHelper):
- not export read-only properties,
- not purge read-only properties,
+1 (these are bugs that need to b
elf):
return self._exportNode()
def __importNode(self, *args)
self._importNode(*args)
node = property(__exportNode, __importNode)
To allow proper subclass overriding and avoid the dead chicken of
having to redefine the node property each time.
Opinions?
Florent
--
Flor
hat expected? For now I convert to utf-8 instead of unicode, but
it feels like the writer should take care of that, no? Or is that a
minidom restriction?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
ng CPS work with CMF 1.6 branch and Zope 2.9
branch. I've had a few fixes to make already, today most things should work.
A few more may come when I test deeper.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nux
ctly or through ZCML),
- five:registerClass the class (this makes it available in
Products.meta_types and for IFAwareObjectManager, which the portal_types ZMI
add menu uses),
- register an IAdding for it, usually coded in browser/. Using the base
class provided by CMFCore it's only a few li
le. There are many profiles. And at
different times the same person may want to read information at a more
detailed level than usual. Just INFO and DEBUG is not enough.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 5
On 14 Dec 2005, at 10:51, yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Can I fix the "pretty" xml exporter to use standard identing? (2
spaces for tags, 4 for attributes)
AFAICS nothing is broken and we don't have a policy for that. So I
would not call it a 'fix'.
2
Can I fix the "pretty" xml exporter to use standard identing? (2
spaces for tags, 4 for attributes)
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
I don't want to start another flamewar, but can I bump down the log
levels of CMF's exportimports a bit ?
INFO is too much.
DEBUG or BLATHER ?
I can add a blather method in GenericSetup.context.Logger.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33
I'd like to make the Properties tab go first, before Contents, in the
setup_tool. Opinions ?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF
On 13 Dec 2005, at 11:01, yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Also, why is the meta_type information duplicated in typesinfo.xml
and types/foo.xml?
The adapter for the container is responsible for creating empty sub-
objects. So in this case the TypesToolXMLAdapter needs to know the
On 13 Dec 2005, at 12:50, yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
When importing an type information from an extension profile, I'm
finding the need to have it specify in which containers'
allowed_content_types it should be added. I'd like to add a pseudo-
property allowed_
specially.
It could even be added to CMF's TI as a real property.
What do you think?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope
CMFCore.browser.typeinfo.FactoryTypeInformationAddView.getProfileInfos p
arses all the profiles types/*.xml files to check their meta_type.
Why not check simply typesinfo.xml ?
Also, why is the meta_type information duplicated in typesinfo.xml
and types/foo.xml?
Florent
--
Florent
r settings using the
setup tool.
Any kind of questions and feedback are welcome.
Cheers,
Yuppie
___
Zope-CMF maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
--
Florent Guilla
that was denied?
Can we fix CookieCrumbler to put a portal_status_message and put the
full message in the error_log?
Log the user through the ZMI, and deactivate the cookie crumbler (by
removing it, or giving it an invalid page in its properties)
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris
making sure the id is stored in
the id attribute (and not __name__ anymore) using _setId explicitely. I also
keep a backward compat id() method for old instances.
I'll remove the old comment that threw you off.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&am
sonal convention that I enclose "English" strings in ""
and all the rest in '', it's useful because it isolates them, English can
have single quotes in it, and non-english very rarely has single quotes in it)
Or even better:
self._logger.info("%r ty
this is done and all of the CMFTopic tests are now passing.
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
ht
hances the
performances
on large scaled projects. (especially the ones with several k
documents
indexed...)
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist -
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I'm in the process of refactoring OFS to use new-style security
declarations (about time ;)), and I stumbled on something which may
or may not be a bug, I don't know, I'd like some else's opinion:
The class SimpleIte
y-patch the super() into place from my
framework and start using events without waiting for Plone or CMF 2.0.
Let's wait a bit and see how 1.6 goes.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
i'll be picking this
work up again on monday evening, california time.
-r
___
Zope-CMF maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
--
Flor
res Zope 2.8/ZODB 3.4 of course.) Some of
the framework should pushed into Zope itself.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@li
Is "uninstalling" part of the use cases that GenericSetup tries to
handle?
How would one go about registering what has to be done to remove an
extension profile for instance?
Has anybody worked in that direction?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&
width I
meant to spend on the 1.6 branch alredy.
Thanks.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.
Dammit, the tests are totally broken on the 1.6 branch. Don't people
ever run the tests?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist
a and metadata. Then I'll also
want a separate "workflow" export that dumps the workflow state and
workflow history. Etc.
Is there any provision in GenericSetup to have multiple node
exporters for the same interface? Named adapters, or multiadapters on
the export context ?
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I'd like to have some clarifications from the Plone team about what
they expect to do w.r.t. events in CMF 1.6.
I see two possibilities:
1. you guys are prepared to do the work needed for Plone products to
use super() in manage_afterAdd & co, in which c
into CMF 1.6
2. you feel that's too dangerous and, as Plone intends to use CMF
1.6, I'll merge for CMF 2.0 only.
Be aware that if 2. is chosen, you won't be able to use Zope 3 events
at all with CMF 1.6.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&am
mail.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See
content in the
site, if a catalog is fully recreated?
In CPS I have the problem for other kinds of tools too (portal_trees,
which caches tree navigation information, and has config to decide
what to keep or not).
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33
In what environement do people playing with CMF 2.0 (trunk) work ?
Because when used with Zope 2 trunk, there are many failing unit tests.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTE
s) is adding the new tab to 'manage_options'. Everything else
could be a shared view.
Anyway I've put this proposal on hold. No need to find a consensus now.
So that I'm clear, I'm not against your proposal,as long as there's still a
way to simply I/O individual
tent types, which makes
PortalFolder.allowedContentTypes have quadratic behavior in the
number of types defined and slows it down a lot.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [E
ctive events? How to do that?
> (RTFM manual pointers welcome; maybe I just need to
> read Philipp's chapter on sites and local utilies again
> but as of now I don't see how you get this together with
> the TTW generation of arbirary many CMF and/or Plone
> sites in one Zope
sounds like too big of a chunk for the
given timeframe...
Indeed and that's why the transition phase allows to keep using
manage_afterAdd, provided a minimum level of cooperation from the
frameworks. The minimum level of cooperations is to use super() properly.
Florent
--
Florent Gui
via WebDAV. I was able
to reconfigure portal_catalog by uploading a modified XML file. But I'm
stuck with 2 issues:
1.) tool IDs don't have an '.xml' suffix
2.) tools like portal_workflow and portal_types that are represented by
a directory of XML files are hard to bootstrap
Rob Miller wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
To repost an earlier mail:
The patch I propose to include is:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-checkins/2005-November/007137.html
Could some Plone folks please test that switching to
CMF/branches/efge-1.5-five-compatible instead of CMF/branches
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
