On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:19 PM, yuppie wrote:
> But an additional ZCatalog branch is an additional maintenance burden.
> And the required change is small and 100% backwards compatible. The
> zope.globalrequest dependency could be made optional.
>
> Do we really need an extra ZCatalog branch for
Hi!
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:19 PM,
> yuppie wrote:
>> But an additional ZCatalog branch is an additional maintenance burden.
>> And the required change is small and 100% backwards compatible. The
>> zope.globalrequest dependency could be made optional.
>>
>> Do we
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:57 PM, yuppie wrote:
> I plan to use zope.globalrequest as fallback if self.REQUEST is not
> available.
>
> What's the best approach for the five.globalrequest dependency? Just use
> zope.globalrequest if it is available? Or specify it in extras_require?
> Or add it to in
On 21 September 2011 13:19, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:57 PM, yuppie wrote:
>> I plan to use zope.globalrequest as fallback if self.REQUEST is not
>> available.
>>
>> What's the best approach for the five.globalrequest dependency? Just use
>> zope.globalrequest if it is
This is the summary for test reports received on the
cmf-tests list between 2011-09-20 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-09-21 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/z