On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 12:19 PM, yuppie <y.2...@wcm-solutions.de> wrote: > But an additional ZCatalog branch is an additional maintenance burden. > And the required change is small and 100% backwards compatible. The > zope.globalrequest dependency could be made optional. > > Do we really need an extra ZCatalog branch for that?
If there's a completely backwards compatible way of doing, we should do that. I was under the impression, that we had to do an API change for some methods and add a new request argument to those. If that argument is required depending on how the tool was retrieved, that's confusing to me and I'd rather go the zope.globalrequest route. Hanno _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
