"Dan L. Pierson" wrote:
> You might want to take a look at the bottom of http://www.lfw.org/python/...
He finally released it! I've been waiting for this since IPC8.
--
Itamar S.T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"It don't get thingier than that!"
___
Zope-D
Kevin Dangoor wrote:
> I'm trying to check if the container from which the user selected a
> product from the add menu has an "acl_users" folder. When the user selects
> the option from the add menu, they get a form. When they submit the form,
> the method (a PythonMethod) does this:
>
> fol
Could someone help me understand adding adding ZClasses a bit further?
First I had a problem with nested ZClasses, which got me into trouble
when I wanted to add ZClasses to each other. So I followed the 'common
wisdom' of adding all ZClasses at the top level of the product. THis
generally works
Hi Zopists,
I would like to use ZODB3 as an object DB to store my own objects. At
the beginning, I will make any text UI but later I want to put my
objects into a ZOPE Folder and store them inside ZOPE ZODB (Zope will
serve as GUI). Generaly I have 2 types of objects:
Container - object with some
Petr Knapek wrote:
> Container - object with some attributes and methods which can collect
> other objects (also Containers)
For these you should inherit from OFS.ObjectManager.ObjectManager.
> Item - an object with some attributes and methods which can not collect
> any other objects but can b
Bill Anderson writes:
> "Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
> >
> > At 04:03 PM 6/6/00 -0600, Bill Anderson wrote:
> > >
> > >I am using the deafult UserSource that comes with LM for the moment (one
> > >step at a time ;)
> >
> > LM or PTK?
>
> LM
>
> (Waiting for Dan's changes before trying _
Hello all,
You probably saw my yesterday post with the first alpha of
ReiserStorage. One of the questions that people tend to ask about it is
wheter they can use it without reiserfs.
There are two problems with not using reiserfs:
1. ReiserStorage (now renamed to DirectoryStorage
- Original Message -
From: "Itamar Shtull-Trauring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kevin Dangoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 3:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Getting to container from a method called by the
factory
> Kevin Dangoor wrote:
> > I
- Original Message -
From: "Rik Hoekstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 4:28 AM
Subject: [Zope-dev] Recursively adding ZClasses (continued)
> First I had a problem with nested ZClasses, which got me into trouble
> when I wanted to add ZClasses
Petru Paler:
This is the embodiment of my MutliFileStorage thingy on Jim's ZODB Wiki. I
droped it (Never picked it up) when Mountable Storage was announced. I'll
create a ReierFS partition some time this week and try it out. Excellent!
> Hello all,
>
>You probably saw my yester
Thanks for replying Kevin, but it won't work ;-( I tried it ALL, and it
_will_not_work_. The nested ZClasses will apparently solve it (I used it
elsewhere), but it will get you into trouble in other situations - if
you want to add an instance of the nested zclass to an existing instance
of that
> This is the embodiment of my MutliFileStorage thingy on Jim's ZODB Wiki. I
Oops, didn't saw the ZODB Wiki until now :)
> droped it (Never picked it up) when Mountable Storage was announced. I'll
> create a ReierFS partition some time this week and try it out. Excellent!
Glad you find
Hi Folks,
ZCVSMixin is now reaching a 'useful' state... at least
for managing objects in a single folder at a time. I haven't
yet tackled recursive folders etc...
I've been running two zope sites, checking in chages on
one site... checking them out on another. Esp nice is
being able to
cool :-)
Keep up the good work...
How long before Zope is a web-accessible CVS repository?
(also accessible by FTP, WebDAV, XML-RPC, etc...)
Chris
PS: When WinCVS can CICO of Zope, I will be a happy man ;-)
Steve Spicklemire wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> ZCVSMixin is now reaching a 'use
Hi,
I also tried to get the patch working with 2.2CVS PTK CVS and had little luck.
I also needed to manually apply the patch and worked through the errors until
I got a security violation with the PTK. I was no longer in any way able to
access any of my test portals using the management interfac
Dieter Maurer wrote:
>
> Zope 2.1.6's ZCatalog contains a small bug in its handling
> of "and not" searches.
>
> URL:http://www.handshake.de/~dieter/pyprojects/zope/andnot.pat
>
> fixes this bug.
This has allready been fixed in the CVS; sorry Dieter. You came up with
the exact fix though, g
This brings up an interesting point... WinCVS can *now* check out these
Zope objects, but the toXML implementation makes them less useful
than they possibly could be.
For example:
http://cvs.spvi.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/zopeObjs/testCVS/hehe.xml.diff?logsort=rev&r1=text&tr1=1.10&r2=text&tr2=1.1
Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
>
> > Container - object with some attributes and methods which can collect
> > other objects (also Containers)
>
> For these you should inherit from OFS.ObjectManager.ObjectManager.
http://www.zope.org/Members/michel/Projects/Interfaces/ObjectManager
defines the
Chip Vanek writes:
> Hi,
>
> I also tried to get the patch working with 2.2CVS PTK CVS and had little luck.
> I also needed to manually apply the patch and worked through the errors until
> I got a security violation with the PTK. I was no longer in any way able to
> access any of my test
Rik Hoekstra writes:
This currently adds recursive ZClasses for me. All ZClasses are on the top
level of the Product, no nesting:
I cut a few things out that didn't have to do with the
- Original Message -
From: "Dan L. Pierson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chip Vanek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 12:47 PM
Subject: RE: [Zope-dev] LM and user objects
> Chip Vanek writes:
> > I also tried to get the patch working with 2.2CVS PTK
OK folks, they're in now.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org
Thanks a lot Jason,
I'll try it (though i'd swear I tried something very much alike)
>
>This currently adds recursive ZClasses for me. All ZClasses are on the top
>level of the Product, no nesting:
>
>
> "ComponentClass.createInObjectManager(_.getitem('unique_id', 1), REQUEST)">
hm,
Petru Paler writes:
> > This is the embodiment of my MutliFileStorage thingy on Jim's ZODB Wiki. I
>
>Oops, didn't saw the ZODB Wiki until now :)
>
> > droped it (Never picked it up) when Mountable Storage was announced. I'll
> > create a ReierFS partition some time this week and try it o
Rik Hoekstra writes:
> Thanks a lot Jason,
>
> I'll try it (though i'd swear I tried something very much alike)
>
> >
> >This currently adds recursive ZClasses for me. All ZClasses are on the top
> >level of the Product, no nesting:
> >
> >
> > >"ComponentClass.createInObjectManager
-Original Message-
From: Jason Spisak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Rik Hoekstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: woensdag 7 juni 2000 22:26
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Recursively adding ZClasses (continued)
>Rik Hoekstra writ
My ZODB article says little about installation, because there's no
good answer at this point, beyond installing all of Zope and adding
$ZOPE/lib/python to your PYTHONPATH. Next week I'm going off to
California for a few days, and will have lots of time to kill, so I'd
like to package ZODB separat
Rik Hoekstra:
Good to hear you got it.
> >Rik Hoekstra writes:
> >
> >> Thanks a lot Jason,
> >>
> >> I'll try it (though i'd swear I tried something very much alike)
>
> It was very much alike, but you were right ;-).
>
> The difference was that I did a
>
> (sort of cut down pseudocode)
>
>
Hello,
First off, sorry for the cross-posting of this message to admin and
to
development.
I'm a software developer for a major ISP in the Midwest region of the
USA.
Recently we began evaluating Zope for use in our web application
development,
internally and for our clients, and have b
> >Glad you find it interesting :)
>
> Very. I think the line between FileSYstem and Database gets more blurred
> every day.
That's what Hans Reiser says all the time :)
> Thanks for the heads up. I have to patch my kernel up to 2.2.11 first,
> then I'll be recompiling, then creating. I
>From my naive understanding, would this help with the problem ZODB has
with regard to folders with many objects? Would a person who is using
DirectoryStorage not necessarily be required to partition their objects
into an artificially derived hierarchical directory structure?
In other words can i
31 matches
Mail list logo
