Hi, this is my first posting on the list, so please be kind
if i make some mistakes ;-)
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leorochael at gmail.com wrote:
I noticed you've been very busy doing clean-up on the Zope2
code base
in the last few hours. As someone who
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Tobias Helfrich helfr...@know-it.net wrote:
OK, so you do think that we might use Zope 2.12 for a quite long time
without thinking about anymore updates? Will there be any security
updates for Zope 2.12 in the future?
You want to use Zope 2.13. 2.12 is at the
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:
... and I still do use the VirtualHostMonster
(you can trash all the other things).
I agree that its code might not been the best in the world, but it
works for the moment and does what it says (I would love to see
On 5 July 2011 09:42, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
What you are describing is exactly what I meant by old legacy Zope2
applications.
You should be able to use this style of development with Zope 2.13.
But you won't be able to upgrade to newer versions of Zope 2 anymore
and
On 5 July 2011 10:18, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would've thought it would also be possible for those who rely on this
to
maintain the relevant eggs as optional installations against Zope 2.x,
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:19 PM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Long-term maintenance for Zope 2.13 would give these
projects/deployments at least a few more years.
Yes. I'm willing to cut releases for it for quite a while. I just
expect to see active maintenance from the Plone community
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:19 PM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Long-term maintenance for Zope 2.13 would give these
projects/deployments at least a few more years.
Yes. I'm willing to cut releases for it for quite a
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
So we just got ourselves a Zope2 version 3.0. And no, naming it 4.0 or
5.0 or anything else doesn't make it any better at all. So 3.0 is the
most
On 7/5/11 11:56 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichtingha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
So we just got ourselves a Zope2 version 3.0. And no, naming it 4.0 or
5.0 or anything else doesn't make it any better at all. So 3.0 is the
most sensible one :)
Boy, that's going to be
On 5 July 2011 11:10, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On 7/5/11 11:56 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichtingha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
So we just got ourselves a Zope2 version 3.0. And no, naming it 4.0 or
5.0 or anything else doesn't make it any better at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 05.07.2011 12:04, schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
So we just got ourselves a Zope2 version 3.0. And no,
Hi Hanno
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Tobias Helfrich
helfr...@know-it.net wrote:
OK, so you do think that we might use Zope 2.12 for a quite
long time
without thinking about anymore updates? Will there be any security
updates for Zope 2.12 in the future?
You want to use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 05.07.2011 11:30, schrieb Martin Aspeli:
On 5 July 2011 10:18, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu
mailto:ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Martin Aspeli
optilude+li...@gmail.com
On 5 July 2011 11:22, Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 05.07.2011 12:04, schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichting
Hi,
On 5 July 2011 11:26, Tobias Helfrich helfr...@know-it.net wrote:
Hi Hanno
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Tobias Helfrich
helfr...@know-it.net wrote:
OK, so you do think that we might use Zope 2.12 for a quite
long time
without thinking about anymore updates? Will there be
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On 7/5/11 11:56 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichtingha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
I'd actually favour calling it Zope2 4.0 just to avoid any mix-up with the
defunct Zope 3, although I don't think
Am 05.07.2011, 14:44 Uhr, schrieb Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org:
zopefour as a domain isn't very helpful. It would add yet another
top-level name to the existing list (Zope 2, Zope 3).
In the best of all possible worlds the package now known as Zope2
would simply be Zope, and its website
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
zopefour as a domain isn't very helpful. It would add yet another
top-level name to the existing list (Zope 2, Zope 3).
That was an April fools joke I was referring to. I didn't mean to
suggest to actually use that in any
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 14:41, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Ok, seems 4.0 is the more popular choice.
I don't agree. Let's go with Fibonacci and call the next release Zope
8, as the logical extension of the series 1, 2, 3, and 5!
:-P
--
Martijn Pieters
Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 14:41, Hanno Schlichtingha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
Ok, seems 4.0 is the more popular choice.
I don't agree. Let's go with Fibonacci and call the next release Zope
8, as the logical extension of the series 1, 2, 3, and 5!
How about
ZopeNG?
On 7/5/11 3:22 AM, zope-dev-requ...@zope.org wrote:
Hanno writes:
Someone might try, but I think it's not a wise decision to spent any
resources that way.
I am trying. I am trying to create a Zope 2 like TTW development
environment on top of BlueBream. I have a small email list of people
Hi Hanno,
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:18, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would've thought it would also be possible for those who rely on this to
maintain the relevant eggs as optional installations
This is the summary for test reports received on the
zope-tests list between 2011-07-04 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-07-05 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.
An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
23 matches
Mail list logo
