On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:29 AM, yuppie wrote:
> Zope 2 has customized implementations of the ``browser:view`` and
> ``browser:page`` directives. I tried to make that code more similar to
> zope.browserpage without breaking Zope 2 and CMF. I guess the biggest change
> I made was removing the Five
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 10.07.2012, 16:29 Uhr, schrieb yuppie :
I guess the biggest
change I made was removing the Five version of BrowserView from the
base classes.
Please let me know if you have any questions or if I did break
something.
I'm sure that's going to break any code that has
fro
Am 10.07.2012, 16:29 Uhr, schrieb yuppie :
Hi!
Zope 2 has customized implementations of the ``browser:view`` and
``browser:page`` directives. I tried to make that code more similar to
zope.browserpage without breaking Zope 2 and CMF. I guess the biggest
change I made was removing the Fiv
Hi!
Zope 2 has customized implementations of the ``browser:view`` and
``browser:page`` directives. I tried to make that code more similar to
zope.browserpage without breaking Zope 2 and CMF. I guess the biggest
change I made was removing the Five version of BrowserView from the base
classes.
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:24:29PM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 09:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> > [1]FAILED Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux
> > https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-July/065159.html
>
> Blew chunks while creating its virtualenv san
