On 9/18/13 4:41 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
I've been working on CSRF protection for zope.formlib.
Anyone else interested in this feature?
We made an internal release of zope.formlib with this functionality and
so far we found no issues in using it in production.
After upd
On 9/18/13 5:26 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
+1 for implementing convenient CSRF.
I wonder if you could make your implementation more orthogonal by
implementing a CSRF "field/widget", and make your `protected` attribute
simply trigger the inclusion of this field implicitly.
This way you
Hi,
I've been working on CSRF protection for zope.formlib.
I have a "csrfprotection" branch in my zope.formlib fork on github. The
changes against the current zope.formlib mainline can be found here:
https://github.com/janwijbrand/zope.formlib/compare/csrfprotection
When creating form compon
On 9/17/13 3:32 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
Is this "reviewer role" something someone takes upon himself? I mean, if I
see a pull request for a code base that I know, I could review the request?
These are good questions. I probably
On 9/17/13 1:47 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
I strongly prefer that the reviewer do the merge.
I'd also really like reviewers to take their responsibility
seriously, making comments and suggestions where appropriate.
Software review, done well, improves the software, and, more
importantly, improves th
On 9/17/13 1:00 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:04:04PM +0200, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
I wonder if there is a formal or informal write-up of how to
"nicely" contribute code to the repositories under the
zopefoundation umbrella.
I don't think so. I&#x
On 9/17/13 12:04 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
snip
2) fork the repository, make a branch in the fork, do my work, push the
changes to my fork, and issue a pull request.
The latter is what I did, without explicitly asking for feedback.
Luckily someone did give me feedback (thanks!) :-)
Now
Hi,
I wonder if there is a formal or informal write-up of how to "nicely"
contribute code to the repositories under the zopefoundation umbrella.
Back in the subversion days I would branch a project, amend code, write
tests, commit this to the repository, ask for feedback on the list, and,
wh
On 3/22/13 12:59 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday, March 22, 2013 10:23:21 AM Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
zopetoolkit
Is everyone ok with me moving this? Hanno mentioned that several external
tools depend on the SVN location and the move was delayed because of that. I
think this package
Hi,
Stephan, may I kindly request a few more package migrations to github?
Here's the list:
groktoolkit
grokcore.errorview
grokcore.permission
grokcore.registries
grokcore.resource
grokui.admin
hurry.query
hurry.workflow
z3c.bcrypt
zc.relation
zc.relationship
zopetoolkit
Thank you *very much*
On 3/1/13 5:29 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday, March 01, 2013 02:37:34 PM Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
megrok.menu
It's done now, but it lost its 0.1 tag due to a conversion issue.
Great! And thanks again!
regards, jw
___
Zop
On 3/1/13 2:49 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday, March 01, 2013 02:37:34 PM Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
I do see someone just created an empty grokcore.component repository on
github (thanks whoever did that! :-) )
It is actually fully converted. :-)
LOL - cool!
I am going to adjust
On 3/1/13 1:39 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
AFAIK Stephan migrated most of the zope.* packages using this process.
Yes, I have, except that I use a one does it all script published here:
https://github.com/zopefoundation/zope.githubsupport
Aha, great!
All you need to do is to create a zope.c
On 3/1/13 2:23 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 11:24:31AM +0100, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
On 3/1/13 10:17 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
My attempt at this: https://gist.github.com/mgedmin/4944724
AFAIK Stephan migrated most of the zope.* packages using this process
On 3/1/13 10:17 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 09:51:05AM +0100, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
Disclaimer: it's been a while since I actively followed zope-dev and
grok-dev. So, please forgive me my ignorance.
A single up-to-date web page sure beats reading months of
Hi,
Disclaimer: it's been a while since I actively followed zope-dev and
grok-dev. So, please forgive me my ignorance.
Spurred by the recent ZTK-2.0 discussion, I'm trying to get back on
track on the topics of 1) migrating package to github and 2) porting
packages to Python 3.
As a first s
Hi,
On 2/26/13 7:26 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
snip
> Our rule for inclusion in the ZTK is: Whatever library is used by at
> least two out of the three frameworks (BlueBream, Grok, Zope).
>
> Given that BlueBream hasn't seen any release beyond a 1.0 about two
> years back, I'm not sure it's act
Hi,
On 2/26/13 5:04 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The process for a ZTK 2.0 release isn't really well defined. I'm not
> sure if Jan-Wijbrand and Christophe are still interested in working on
> ZTK releases.
I'm personally and from a business-perspective still interested in the
ZTK and
On 9/16/12 09:38 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2012, at 07:28, Marius Gedminas wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 01:44:30PM +0200, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>>> After years and years of heavily using zope.formlib it suddenly struck
>>> me that the zope
On 9/16/12 07:28 , Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 01:44:30PM +0200, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>> The reason I came across this "issue" is trying to improve the test
>> coverage of the application I'm building somewhat closer to 100% and
Hi,
After years and years of heavily using zope.formlib it suddenly struck
me that the zope.formlib.form.action decorator returns an Action()
object instead of the decorated function (this action object is also
added to the form's actions sequence as a "side effect" of the decorator).
I know wond
On 7/3/12 15:06 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
> wrote:
>> At the end of this post, I pasted the diff from the current zope.intid
>> trunk against your "fork" on bitbucket. Maybe this would make it easier
>> fo
On 7/3/12 13:26 , Cykooz wrote:
> 2012/7/3 Jan-Wijbrand Kolman <mailto:janwijbr...@gmail.com>>
>
> Are you basically using a forked zope.keyreference for the time being?
>
> No, I do not use a forked zope.keyreference. I used my fork of the
> zope.intid.
Ah, y
On 1/24/12 23:49 , Cykooz wrote:
> 2012/1/25 Marius Gedminas :
>>
>> http://foundation.zope.org/agreements is where you can find the
>> committer agreement form.
>
> Thanks.
> But I have one problem. I do not know any of the existing Committer
> who can vouch for me.
Bringing up a rather old thre
Thanks.
Released as zope.error 3.7.3.
regards, jw
On 17/01/2012 21:33 , Jim Fulton wrote:
Done.
Jim
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to make a bugfix release for zope.error. Could someone grant me the
needed permissions on pypi for this? My
Hi,
I'd like to make a bugfix release for zope.error. Could someone grant me
the needed permissions on pypi for this? My pypi handle is "jw".
Thank you in advance.
regards, jw
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailma
On 6/6/11 16:48 , Tres Seaver wrote:
> On 06/05/2011 02:24 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
[1]FAILED Zope Buildbot / zope2.13-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-June/042535.html
>>>
On 4/7/11 07:00 , Zope tests summarizer wrote:
> This is the summary for test reports received on the
> zope-tests list between 2011-04-05 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-04-06 00:00:00 UTC:
> [5]FAILED Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1-py2.5 slave-ubuntu64
> https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-t
On 4/4/11 12:57 , Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
> Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
> Period Sun Apr 3 11:00:00 2011 UTC to Mon Apr 4 11:00:00 2011 UTC.
> There were 186 messages: 8 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 23
> from buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 8 from ccomb at free.f
On 3/30/11 13:17 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12-py2.6 slave-ubuntu32
>> From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
>> Date: Tue Mar 29 17:09:03 EDT 2011
>> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-March/036550.html
>>
>> Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot /
On 3/30/11 9:11 AM, Jan-Jaap Driessen wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:22, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>> Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0_win-py2.6 slave-win
>>> From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
>>> Date: Mon Mar 28 15:18:14 EDT 20
On 3/21/11 10:30 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>>> - you may have some draft files in your tree that are not ready
for use
>>> and never referenced anywhere, but a scan will still process them.
>>
>> This is true.
>
> I ran into this with .html.py files generated by Chameleon as well. My
> Z
On 3/20/11 16:12 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>>> Both Grok and Pyramid (or martian and venusian really) do a scan of
>>> the code to find the registration hints.
>>
>> Pyramid only does so if you tell it to do so by using config.scan(). You
>> are not obliged to do that, and I have several pyramid
Hi,
Not sure where to 'hook into' the discussion thread, so I'll just start
here:
On 3/20/11 15:28 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Hm, it's been a while since I've looked at grok. Some notes:
>
> - The mechanism I'm thinking of should not require *any* ZCML.
Do you mean "without having a configure.zcml
On 2/7/11 18:03 PM, Roger wrote:
> why not use the same pattern like I changed to in z3c.authenticator.
> There the camefrom request part was replaced by session handling.
>
> On the other side, I think your changes are fine since, I guess
> someone from gocept, a long time ago, fixed and protected
On 2/7/11 12:04 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm not sure whether you open up a security hole there.
> Imagine that someone does a
> http://yoursite.com/@@loginform.html?camefrom=http://mysite.com
> We ended up with storing the camefrom URL in a session variable.
The redirect method in the
Hi,
The SessionCredentialsPlugin will redirect to a login form whenever a
user needs to be authenticated. The URL to this login form will have a
"camefrom" query string, where the "camefrom" is the path-information to
the originally requested view.
When the credentials provided by the user are
olkit/index/1.1/zopeapp-versions.cfg
There's a bit of high level change overview available at
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/releases/overview-1.1.html
Kind regards,
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mai
Hi,
The ZTK-releaseteam is making plans for a ZTK-1.1 release. We aim for a
release next week. Except for an updated versions list [1], other
significant changes will be:
* dropping python-2.4 support
* gaining python-2.7 support
* more deprecated zope.app.* packages [2]
We welcome questions,
On 11/26/10 10:49 AM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
> On 11/26/10 8:37 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
>> currently the ZTK tests on the trunk do not run successfully in a
>> virtualenv.
>
>> But reverting this change does not help to get the tests of
>> z3c.recipe.compatte
On 11/26/10 8:37 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
> currently the ZTK tests on the trunk do not run successfully in a
> virtualenv.
> But reverting this change does not help to get the tests of
> z3c.recipe.compattest itself running again. There are the same errors
> like before.
>
> Is it intensional th
On 11/18/10 16:50 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/18/2010 05:19 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>> On 11/18/10 11:16 , Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>>> +The ZTK would like to use distribute by default.
>
>> Is the
On 10/18/10 21:16 PM, Michael Howitz wrote:
> Am 18.10.2010 um 11:02 schrieb Jan-Wijbrand Kolman:
>> I propose to release this as 1.5.0, which would be a major version
>> release that would indicate: "Watch out, potentially backwards
>> incompatible changes ahead!".
On 10/13/10 18:56 , Michael Howitz wrote:
> Am 13.10.2010 um 16:05 schrieb Jan-Wijbrand Kolman:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> A while ago zope.pluggable split off reusable components from
>> zope.app.authentication. The concrete IAuthenticatorPlugin
>> implementations (prin
Hi Michael and Marius,
Thanks for the feedback and suggestions! This is what I did:
On 10/13/10 15:37 , Michael Howitz wrote:
> Am 13.10.2010 um 13:50 schrieb Jan-Wijbrand Kolman:
>> Then there's no real need for a browser extra, as the browser
>> subpackage does not really
with us on this mailing list.
Kind regards,
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/lis
Hi,
A while ago zope.pluggable split off reusable components from
zope.app.authentication. The concrete IAuthenticatorPlugin
implementations (principalfolder and groupfolder) however, were left in
zope.app.authentication.
I think it makes sense to move these IAuthenticatorPlugin
implementatio
On 10/13/10 13:42 , Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
> Good idea. This would improve the testing situation. That would
> definitely help the Grok Toolkit, as it could then run the "normal"
> tests in the context of the toolkit, without pulling in the dependencies
> of the bro
On 10/13/10 13:16 , Michael Howitz wrote:
> Am 13.10.2010 um 10:02 schrieb Jan-Wijbrand Kolman:
>> If I would be pedantic here I'd say there is no such thing as
>> renaming a permission. When the old name is gone, it is gone.
>> There's no mechanism similar to the
On 10/6/10 08:08 , Michael Howitz wrote:
> Am 05.10.2010 um 20:21 schrieb Jan-Wijbrand Kolman:
>> Today I fixed a small bug in zc.catalog (the ftesting.zcml depended
>> on a permission name that has been removed from zope.dublincore).
>
> Actually the permission h
Hi,
As it seems wiki.zope.org is down, as is download.zope.org. But probably
this is already known..? Is there anything I can do to help getting the
machine(s) back up?
regards, jw
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mai
On 10/7/10 10:20 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
> * Jan-Wijbrand Kolman [2010-10-06 13:39]:
>> BTW, I discussed updating the z3c.recipe.i18n for similar reasons - to
>> support newer buildout features - in a separate thread. There people
>> seemed to be +1 on releasing a rec
On 10/6/10 10:27 AM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
> On 10/6/10 9:53 AM, yuppie wrote:
>> Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>>> This afternoon I merged the "gary-0.8.0" branch for z3c.recipe.i18n. The
>>> recipe now uses and depends on zc.buildout-1.5.1 features. I'
On 10/6/10 12:49 PM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
> * Jan-Jaap Driessen [2010-10-05 18:09]:
>> Version 0.12.2 of z3c.recipe.compattest is not compatible with recent
>> versions of it's dependencies zc.buildout (v1.5.1), zc.recipe.egg
>> (v1.3.2) and z3c.recipe.scripts. I fixed this in revision 11725
On 10/6/10 9:53 AM, yuppie wrote:
> Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>> This afternoon I merged the "gary-0.8.0" branch for z3c.recipe.i18n. The
>> recipe now uses and depends on zc.buildout-1.5.1 features. I'd like to
>> release this merge as 0.8.0 as this make
Hi,
Today I fixed a small bug in zc.catalog (the ftesting.zcml depended on a
permission name that has been removed from zope.dublincore). This made
me realize that zc.catalog contains ZMI code in the browser subpackage.
Are people still using this ZMI code from zc.catalog? Would it be an
idea
Hi,
This afternoon I merged the "gary-0.8.0" branch for z3c.recipe.i18n. The
recipe now uses and depends on zc.buildout-1.5.1 features. I'd like to
release this merge as 0.8.0 as this make it possible to move grok and
the groktoolkit over to zc.buildout-1.5.1. I guess this is also useful
in th
e to
start discussing with us on this mailing list.
Kind regards,
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
https://mai
On 6/30/10 21:47 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> To use the ZTK release, you can use:
>
> [buildout]
> extends =
> http://download.zope.org/zopetoolkit/index/1.0a1/ztk-versions.cfg
> http://download.zope.org/zopetoolkit/index/1.0a1/zopeapp-versions.cfg
>
> This first release focuses on get
Hi,
Grok would be greatly helped with a 1.4.4 bugfix release of zc.catalog.
The fix we want is already implemented, we just need a release.
Is someone willing to do that? (or, would allow me to do it by granting
pypi right for the package? My pypi username is jw).
kind regards, jw
___
On 6/3/10 8:20 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just fixed up z3c.ajax and it has a quirk that the check doesn't know
> about:
>
> If a file doesn't contain any copyright attribution header, it ignores
> that file.
>
> In this case, z3c.ajax has no headers at all. no setup.py. no buildout.
>
On 6/3/10 8:40 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
> On 06/02/2010 05:19 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>>> On 6/2/10 15:11 , Christian Theune wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>
Hi,
Another one I'm not sure about:
jquery.javascript
The zope.repositorypolicy readme instructs me to remove the files that
are copyright to a non-committer. So in this case I should remove the
whole 'js' directory from the package I guess?
regards, jw
___
Hi,
What should I do with a package such as lovely.memcached where the
copyright is currently attributed to "Lovely Systems and Contributors"?
Just apply the fix script?
regards, jw
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/ma
On 6/2/10 15:11 , Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the ZF needs to finish updating the copyright attributions to state that
> the Zope code now belongs to the foundation.
>
> I've prepared some scripts to help with monitoring which packages need
> to be updated and also a helper to update most cas
On 6/2/10 15:11 , Christian Theune wrote:
> So, I'm the first one to step up to do a hundred of them until Friday
> 2010-06-11. Who else is joining me?
I'll take a batch of ten per day until 2010-06-11.
Can I just pick from the list, or will you (or someone) hand out a batch?
regards, jw
__
On 5/27/10 8:12 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
>> Could someone please grant me (username "jw") access to zope.password as
>> well? Thanks in advance!
>
> According to PyPI jw has Owner privileges already (by now).
Uli granted me access, but his reply to me about it didn't make it to
the list someho
On 5/26/10 08:46 , Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 26, 2010, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>> Could someone grant me pypi access to zope.app.authentication and
>> zope.password?
>
> Done.
Thanks.
However, I see "myself" in the list of package owners for
z
Hello,
Could someone grant me pypi access to zope.app.authentication and
zope.password?
My pypi username is "jw".
For compatibility reasons the upcoming Grok-1.0.x bugfix release cannot
jump to a newer zope.app.authentication version, but I'd still like to
add support for the SSHA password m
Hi,
When I define a principal in my site.zcml and have it use the
SSHAPasswordManager, I cannot login as a "TypeError: character mapping
must return integer, None or unicode" is raised in the checkPassword()
methid. It took me quite a while to figure out what was going on...
The site.zcml cont
Christian Theune wrote:
> On 03/29/2010 04:08 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> on the way towards a ZTK 1.0 release we first looked for a single
>> volunteer release manager who would drive the process.
>>
>> As no one stepped up and no (serious) nominations were presented the
>
Adam GROSZER wrote:
> JWK> I'll make a release of z3c.password then too, if you agree with that.
>
> Sure. I'd go with a minor version increment. E.g. 0.10.1.
We were at 0.9.0, I made it a 0.10.0.
Great for having these features available!!
regards, jw
___
Adam GROSZER wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> The only weird is to define those constants in the method parameters.
>
> def _isIrrelevantRequest(self, RELEVANTlse, IRRELEVANT ue):
>
> Do you call this method from somewhere else?
>
> Maybe it would be better to change the name (and behavour) to
> _isR
Hi,
A while ago I asked some questions and made some suggestions for improving how
to track failed login attempts in z3c.password. Most likely these suggestions
got buried in now a out-of-sight thread and were never noticed.
My suggestion was that making a request for for example a resource cou
Michael Howitz wrote:
>> Would it be possible for one of the package owners to make a release,
>> or, alternatively, allow me to upload a new version to the package
>> index? (My pypi username is jw).
>
> Done.
Thanks!
I just released z3c.password 0.9.0.
regards, jw
_
Hello,
I would be greatly helped with a new release of z3c.password with the
Dutch translations that I recently added.
Would it be possible for one of the package owners to make a release,
or, alternatively, allow me to upload a new version to the package
index? (My pypi username is jw).
Thank
Hi Adam,
Adam GROSZER wrote:
> We're using it too...
> Go for 0.8.0.
I noticed that requesting for, for example, a resource could still trigger
account locked errors, where in my opinion only the login attempts
themselves should do that.
I created a branch...
http://svn.zope.org/z3c.password
Hi Adam,
Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Adam GROSZER wrote:
>
>> Thinking this further, resource requests will have a '/@@/' (usually)
>> in their URL. So it might be an idea to skip those requests from
>> counting.
>
> Seems to me skipping anything except POST reque
Marius Gedminas wrote:
> Marius Gedminas wrote:
> Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:48:41AM +0000, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>> I'd like to make a 3.6.1 bugfix release for zope.app.wsgi.
>>
>> On the trunk there's support for pickin
Hi,
I'd like to make a 3.6.1 bugfix release for zope.app.wsgi.
On the trunk there's support for picking up "product configuration"
that has not been released yet (however, it had been released in a
bugfix release in the 3.4 line).
Could I ask someone to grant me pypi rights for this package?
Hi,
Christian Theune wrote:
> On 01/26/2010 03:30 PM, Souheil CHELFOUH wrote:
>> Well, the first step is already to cut the dependencies and get a sane
>> tree and a reusable package.
>> The second step, however, if people feel like it, will be to refactor
>> a bit and _that_ will need careful pl
Hi,
Christian Theune wrote:
> On 01/26/2010 09:32 AM, Souheil CHELFOUH wrote:
>> I hear you and understand you.
>
> Thanks. :)
>
>> I'm not advertizing for an immediate and brainless action.
>> What I did this week end is simply to split the PAU from all the
>> components provided with it (wel
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> This is to announce my withdrawal from the Zope Toolkit steering
> group.
I'm not sure if you're reading this, but I wanted to thank you anyway
for the tremendous amount of energy you've put into the steering
group.
kind regards,
jw
___
Adam GROSZER wrote:
Thank you for your reply!
> Right. Well right now the lame solution is to try to count the number
> of resources needed to load the page and multiply maxFailedAttempts by
> that number.
> Other than that you _will_ want to offload resources in production.
Oh, sure in _produ
"Roger" wrote:
>> Betreff: [Zope-dev] z3c.password and "failedAttempts"
>> andSessionCredentialsPlugin
>>
>> I'm looking into integrating z3c.password into an application
>> that also uses the PAU with the principal folder,
>> InternalPrincipals and the SessionCredentialsPlugin.
>>
>> One of
Hi,
I'm looking into integrating z3c.password into an application that
also uses the PAU with the principal folder, InternalPrincipals and
the SessionCredentialsPlugin.
One of the features of z3c.password that I'd like to use is locking
out an user account after a number of failed login attemp
Gediminas Paulauskas wrote:
>> I'll make it require zope.browserpage and release (and upload!)
>> zope.app.exception 3.7.0.
> Could you upload 3.6.0 as it was anyway, the ISystemErrorView move
> would be useful for me since I run SchoolTool on an older/custom
> KGS.
Yes. Done.
regards,
jw
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> 25 zope.app packages are broken due to changes in zope.publisher 3.12.
>> zope.publisher had some components factored out of it into zope.login.
>>
>> I fixed zope.app.exception: it could be fixed by adding the
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> 25 zope.app packages are broken due to changes in zope.publisher 3.12.
> zope.publisher had some components factored out of it into zope.login.
>
> I fixed zope.app.exception: it could be fixed by adding the zope.login
> requirement and adding a zcml include statement.
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>> I'm trying to figure out what has changed that could be related to this, but
if
>> anyone has a hint for me...
>
> I can definitely reproduce the error.
>
> It seems to be occurring somewhere in
Baiju M wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
> wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>> Would any of the owners of zope.app.pagetemplate be so kind to upload
>> (or let me upload) a new version of zope.app.pagetemplate?
>
> Added "jw" as o
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
> Baiju M wrote:
>> $ ./bin/test
>> /opt/baiju/wa/z3hello/eggs/zope.testing-3.8.6-py2.6.egg/zope/testing/
> testrunner/debug.py:23:
>> DeprecationWarning: zope.testing.doctest is deprecated in favour of
>> the Python standard li
hello,
Would any of the owners of zope.app.pagetemplate be so kind to upload
(or let me upload) a new version of zope.app.pagetemplate?
This will allow me to fix and release zope.app.exception.
regards,
jw
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.or
Baiju M wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
> wrote:
>> Would any of the pypi owners of zope.app.exception be so kind to
>> upload the 3.6.0 release to the package index? I see this package has
>> been tagged already a while ago.
>>
>&g
hello,
Would any of the pypi owners of zope.app.exception be so kind to
upload the 3.6.0 release to the package index? I see this package has
been tagged already a while ago.
I think this newer version should also be included in the ZTK versions
list, as this version will import the correct IS
Hi,
I'm about to work a bit on z3c.schema2json [1]. As has been briefly
discussed before (a while ago [2]), z3c. schema2json is so similar to
z3c.schema2xml [3] in what it does and how it does it, that I wonder
about merging the two packages somehow.
One way to do this - maybe - is to use name
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Friday 18 September 2009, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>> While working on it we wondered how and where people using
>> z3c.hashedresource set the caching headers for the resources referenced
>> by the URLs generated by z3c.hashedres
Hi,
We're trying to make an integration of z3c.hashedresource into Grok.
While working on it we wondered how and where people using
z3c.hashedresource set the caching headers for the resources referenced
by the URLs generated by z3c.hashedresource.
A few random thoughts about this:
* zope.bro
Chris Withers wrote:
> Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
>> Zope.sendmail explains in its README.txt that the developer using
>> zope.sendmail should himself take care of not sending emails (by setting
>> up a test layer for example, that would register a no-op IMailDelivery
>
Adam GROSZER wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd rather use a mailer stub for testing.
> Like the one in zope.sendmail.tests.test_mailer.py
>
> ...
> class SMTP(object):
> ...
>
> Something like this can be setup for individual tests with
>
> name="mailer-name"
> provides="zope.sendmail.inte
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
