On Jul 17, 2013, at 12:41 , Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
I'm somewhat ashamed to admit that I don't know how to do that.
Normally I get setuptools with sudo apt-get install python-setuptools,
or by creating a virtualenv.
I have setuptools 0.9.1 deb packages if you need them. One
On Jul 12, 2013, at 02:38, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/11/2013 01:05 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
FWIW I tried to upgrade a few projects to zc.buildout 2.2 today but
had to revert to a buildout 1.x due to conflicts
On Jul 11, 2013, at 16:44 , Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/11/2013 03:55 AM, Patrick Gerken wrote:
now I have to create a virtualenv with --distribute, then I have to
upgrade setuptools
We should be upgrading all our
On Jun 3, 2013, at 14:37 , Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/02/2013 09:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list
between 2013-06-01 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-06-02
On May 28, 2013, at 08:19, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
[1]FAILED winbot / z3c.layer.ready2go_py_265_32
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2013-May/075191.html
Looks like a transient
On Mar 15, 2013, at 07:57, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
[8]winbot / zope.app.wsgi_py_265_32
I misunderstood last time. *** empty log message *** does not mean
this is a clone of an empty repo. It's *the actual svn commit message*
of the last commit:
On Mar 1, 2013, at 19:06, Suresh V. suresh...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Friday 01 March 2013 02:15 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
I'm sorry, it's early in the morning. It is of course:
sorted(sorted(news_stories, key=lambda x: x.publication_date,
reverse=True), key=lambda x:
On Feb 28, 2013, at 14:43 , Stephan Richter stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to deprecate zope.sequencesort in ZTK 2.0, since it cannot
properly ported to Python 3, since it depends heavily on the cmp() way of
sorting. I am also not a user of the package and I
On Feb 21, 2013, at 09:08 , Hans-Peter Locher hans-peter.loc...@inquant.de
wrote:
In my opinion utf-8 urls are
the same kind of evil as having
tabs and whitespaces in filenames.
Can you explain your reasoning?
Wichert.
___
Zope-Dev maillist
On Feb 20, 2013, at 12:47 , Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:57:52AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I want to propose that we do the following:
Allow arbitrary str object ids in Zope 4 based on Dieter's work.
Configure standard name choosers, normalizers
On Feb 21, 2013, at 09:26 , Christian Ledermann christian.lederm...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree with Hans Peter,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On Feb 21, 2013, at 09:08 , Hans-Peter Locher hans-peter.loc...@inquant.de
wrote:
In my
On Feb 21, 2013, at 09:38 , Hans-Peter Locher hans-peter.loc...@inquant.de
wrote:
In a distributed application,
you cannot always ensure that you have each component
under control.
The url is the most basic interface to a web application.
In Plone the id (and therefore the url) is
On Feb 22, 2013, at 07:30, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
[1]FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.6.8 : Linux
[2]FAILED (failures=2) : Zope-trunk Python-2.7.3 : Linux
Same old (menu actions are now
Currently Zope has two rules for object ids: 1) they must be str instances, and
2) they must only consist of alphanumerics and a few extra characters. I have
been playing around recently with trying to relax those rules to allow more
flexible object ids, specifically allowing UTF-8 object ids.
On Feb 20, 2013, at 15:48 , Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 01:00:02AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
This is the summary for test reports received on the
zope-tests list between 2013-02-18 00:00:00 UTC and 2013-02-19 00:00:00 UTC:
I finally got tired
On Feb 6, 2013, at 11:54 , Duncan Booth duncan.bo...@suttoncourtenay.org.uk
wrote:
Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
I used to do this:
import transaction
with transaction:
... print 'hello'
...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File console, line 1, in
I want to use INameChooser to select the id of copied content. This is
currently not possible since manage_pasteObject does not pass the object to be
pasted to _get_id. I added a new wichert-ofs-paste-naming branch to extend
_get_id to make that possible. Are there any objections to merging
I noticed that the Zope2 git mirror does not appear to be updating. Looking at
https://github.com/zopefoundation/Zope/commits/2.13 it doesn't have any commits
after November 15, while subversion has more recent commits from Hanno and
Maurits. Did an updating process break? Or did development
On Jan 11, 2013, at 14:10 , Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On Jan 11, 2013, at 14:07 , Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
I noticed that the Zope2 git mirror does not appear to be updating. Looking
at https://github.com/zopefoundation/Zope/commits/2.13 it doesn't have
On Sep 16, 2012, at 07:28, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 01:44:30PM +0200, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
After years and years of heavily using zope.formlib it suddenly struck
me that the zope.formlib.form.action decorator returns an Action()
object instead of
On 09/06/2012 10:58 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 01:00:01AM +, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
[2]FAILED winbot / z3c.coverage_py_265_32
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-September/067652.html
[3]FAILED winbot / z3c.coverage_py_265_32
On 08/20/2012 12:39 PM, Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 20.08.2012, 12:27 Uhr, schrieb Robert Niederreiter
r...@squarewave.at:
even the linux kernel guys seem to prefer the benefits of github.
https://github.com/torvalds/linux
Yes, promotional materials would have nothing to do with the
commercial
. github allows pull requests from a different
branch within the same repository which makes this very easy.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple
Foundation one? The author has also never been listed
as the foundation but Jim personally, which seems to imply zc.buildout
never was Zope Foundation-owned software.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make
is supported by xgettext by default. Zope
tools like i18nduder have to be adjusted (they don't support ungettext
right now). I already adjusted lingua by Wichert Akkerman
(https://github.com/tmassman/lingua) - the pull request is still open.
If I remember correctly that pull request is waiting
On 05/18/2012 10:07 AM, Thomas Massmann wrote:
Hi,
I can do it. But I'm not that familiar with Pylons/Pyramid right now.
So this will basically take some time. But, yes ;)
translationstring is a very simple package that doesn't have any
Pylons/Pyramid dependencies itself. It shouldn't be
On 02/01/2012 02:29 PM, Alex Clark wrote:
Actually, they introduced improved Subversion client support late last
year:
- https://github.com/blog/966-improved-subversion-client-support
Unfortunately it is too unstable to be usable.
Wichert.
___
On Tue 31 Jan 2012 08:24:24 AM CET, David Glick wrote:
On 1/30/12 11:15 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello,
I think we need to automate sdist upload, the .mo files are missing
from the release.
Any ideas other than patching setup.py to create the .mo files
automatically?
See zest.releaser [1]
On 01/03/2012 10:04 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On Jan 3, 2012, at 09:34 , Sylvain Viollon wrote:
We use Paster as well in the stack, and use it to configure the Python
logging process, you can configure
there a logging to syslog, and after having a central syslog server. I think it
is more
On 01/01/2012 08:39 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
There are three known WSGI implementations of the Zope 2 publisher.
I've had a look at them and made some notes about what I think
provides the best story:
## Zope 2.13 WSGIPublisher
Pros:
* Allows distributed transaction management with
On 11/24/2011 01:29 AM, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:50:49 -0500, Tres Seavertsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Second, it is already feasible to work with modern VCSes against the
existing SVN repository: I've been doing it with bzr for literally years
now; I know of lots of
On 11/22/2011 11:13 AM, Sylvain Viollon wrote:
Op 17 nov 2011, om 20:57 heeft Tres Seaver het volgende geschreven:
Note that there is a counter-trend here among the Pyramid crew: many
developers *want* tight integration of authentication, particularly the
login forms.
I'm not sure I fully
On 11/09/2011 09:57 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Any idea what mx1.emailsrvr.com doesn't like?
Is it Bejni's address, the email in question or that isn't coming from
server1.simplistix.co.uk?
The first - it looks like zope.com email isn't configured correctly.
Wichert.
On 11/03/2011 11:54 AM, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
On 2011-11-03, at 0025, Chris Withers wrote:
I'm experimenting with using nose as an alternative to zope.testrunner
so I can take advantage of the junit and cobertura compatible xml output
offered.
Using
On 10/31/2011 07:21 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
These
are all failures in the following zopeapp test::
- zope/app/applicationcontrol/tests/test_zope_version.py
def test_WrongLocale(self):
Demonstrate bug 177733
currentPath =
On 10/12/2011 10:45 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On Oct 11, 2011, at 18:38 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I have a buildout that needs
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.7.8/Zope-2.7.8-final.tgz still..
Jim sent me a tarball containing just the binary files from underneath
/Products, such as .tgz
will require at least the final from each series to continue
working. Ultimately, I'd love to be able to access all the old tarballs
e.g. similar to:
I have a buildout that needs
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.7.8/Zope-2.7.8-final.tgz still..
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net
On 2011-7-4 11:59, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 06:10:48PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 2011-7-3 17:48, Martin Aspeli wrote:
FWIW, we have a high-performance, high-load application in production on
Plone 4 with collective.beaker relying heavily on sessions, and I'm
of Zope clients.
In my experience it depends highly on the memcache client library you
use with beaker. With some the results are disastrous, with other it is
stable. Where possible I have switched to cookie-based sessions to
prevent stability problems.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich
never
been used for anything other than it's bugtracker.
I would agree that it would be nice to have a single location that lists
historic releases, I would expect that to be on zope.org instead of
launchpad or some other random third party website.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich
On 2011-4-20 21:59, Martijn Faassen wrote:
On 03/29/2011 02:43 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 3/29/11 14:40 , Stephan Richter wrote:
Yeah, Marius led me recently to that path too. Write a narrative in text
files
and use doc strings of functions to do edge cases (or when you don't have
you think authentication has something
to do with the z3c.form library? Did I miss
something?
CSRF has nothing to do with authentication. It has to do with securing
forms on websites.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net
On 3/31/11 08:23 , Jan-Jaap Driessen wrote:
Hi,
I added nl translations to z3c.schema, could someone grant me
('janjaapdriessen') pypi access so I can release this as 0.7.1?
Can you reply to my comment on your translation commit? I don't think
the current language used in z3c.schema is very
On 3/29/11 14:40 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday, March 29, 2011, Jim Fulton wrote:
so I may forgo them.
Which is a mistake. You should create separate tests. I typically put
large tests, dealing with main use cases where there is a definite
flow of activity in '.test' files. I do
sounds like exactly that.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman
On 3/21/11 10:17 , Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
On 3/20/11 16:12 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Pyramid only does so if you tell it to do so by using config.scan(). You
are not obliged to do that, and I have several pyramid projects which do
not do any scanning. Not doing scanning has the advantage
On 3/20/11 16:00 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Jim Fultonj...@zope.com wrote:
- The mechanism shouldn't require something to grok/analyze the
code. The mechanism should be explicit. This is implied by
pythonic. I remember Grok being more implicit than
On 3/20/11 16:03 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 3/20/11 16:00 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Jim Fultonj...@zope.com wrote:
- The mechanism shouldn't require something to grok/analyze the
code. The mechanism should be explicit. This is implied by
pythonic
WebTest wraps the WSGI app object directly and
does not require monkeypatching urllib. To send requests to the app
under testing you call WebTest post/get methods, which directly call the
WSGI app.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net
On 1/24/11 14:03 , Michael Howitz wrote:
Log message for revision 119869:
made room for more tests
Changed:
A zope.testbrowser/tags/3.10.3/src/zope/testbrowser/tests/
A zope.testbrowser/tags/3.10.3/src/zope/testbrowser/tests/__init__.py
A
frequently getting bug reports from users. And it had 742 downloads since
July. That is not a huge number, but more than other packages that are not
part of the standard Plone/Zope 2/Bluebream dependency tree.
If only those bugreports would get some response :)
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman
On 2010-12-22 11:13, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday, December 21, 2010, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I am frequently getting bug reports from users. And it had 742 downloads
since July. That is not a huge number, but more than other packages that
are not part of the standard Plone/Zope 2
On 12/1/10 09:04 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/1/10 08:59 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 2010-12-1 07:43, Christian Theune wrote:
Here's the draft we ended up with yesterday:
http://dpaste.com/281566/
Can you move the non-OK results above
/281566/
Can you move the non-OK results above the list of reports received? That
way you have the most important information first.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple
On 11/25/10 11:31 , Lennart Regebro wrote:
Which style do you prefer? I'll make zope.hookable, zope.i18nmessage
and zope.proxy use the same style if we can agree on one.
The second. #ifdefs in code make code hard to follow and tend to lead to
problems. FWIW the Linux kernel tree has a similar
On 11/18/10 11:16 , Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
+The ZTK would like to use distribute by default.
Is the distribute project still alive? The reason I ask is that my
recent experience is that bugs reported in setuptools are fixed very
quickly, while there is no response from the distribute team.
On 11/18/10 16:50 , Tres Seaver wrote:
I'm -1 on preferring 'distribute' in any overt way in the ZTK. Folks
who want it can already use it when bootstrapping a buildout::
+1 (on your -1)
Wichert.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On 10/12/10 02:21 , Laurence Rowe wrote:
I'm currently implementing single sign on across Plone sites but have
run into a bit of an issue with the CookieAuthHelper.
Unauthorized accesses are redirected to its login_path attribute even
when a user is already logged in. Plone works around this
On 10/7/10 08:52 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/6/10 18:33 , Tres Seaver wrote:
+1 for dropping the test: if we aren't going to try to fix it to pass,
then scrap it. Note that I actually feel the same way about *all* the
every-day failures:
On 10/7/10 11:09 , Patrick Gerken wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:50, Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 10/7/10 08:52 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
For me personally the value has dropped so far that I am mostly ignoring
those emails. They are hard to parse to begin with and there are
On 10/7/10 11:26 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net wrote:
Perhaps more important is brevity. If the mail was a simple thing with a
maximum of 15 lines or so where you can immediately see if something is
wrong or not it would be much
On 10/7/10 11:35 , Patrick Gerken wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:28, Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 10/7/10 11:26 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
+1 for a brief summary, the direct links to the build results are
still important though and should be somewhere in the mail
Please
On 10/6/10 09:53 , yuppie wrote:
Hi!
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
This afternoon I merged the gary-0.8.0 branch for z3c.recipe.i18n. The
recipe now uses and depends on zc.buildout-1.5.1 features. I'd like to
release this merge as 0.8.0 as this make it possible to move grok and
the
On 9/3/10 18:21 , Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I have noticed that now that we are almost exclusively using eggs to
distribute our software using bin/instance run has become difficult:
often the script you want to run is located
are
using it for non-Plone systems as well.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https
On 2010-9-5 16:03, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 2010-9-4 00:43, Chris Withers wrote:
On 03/09/2010 17:21, Tres Seaver wrote:
I am not sure if this is best done in plone.recipe.zope2instance or
Zope2.Startup.zopectl. They have differing versions of ZopeCmd. Perhaps
the plone.recipe.zope2instance
I have noticed that now that we are almost exclusively using eggs to
distribute our software using bin/instance run has become difficult:
often the script you want to run is located inside an egg which makes to
path to it hard to predict. This is not the most user friendly command:
On 9/3/10 10:27 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net wrote:
I have noticed that now that we are almost exclusively using eggs to
distribute our software using bin/instance run has become difficult: often
the script you want to run is
On 8/31/10 10:32 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Christian Theunec...@gocept.com wrote:
our weekly meeting is coming up today at 15:00 UTC.
I won't make it to todays meeting, so some notes upfront.
- Supporting Python 2.7
I thought the current plan is to
by providing an adapter on the request.
I would suggest request and context, so it is more generally useful. I
suspect plone.caching already has such an adapter.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make
On 8/4/10 17:38 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
IMHO trying to come up with some kind of programmatic algorithm to judge
a bit of documentation as good enough to show is insane. I'm not
going to attempt it.
Fair enough.
Maybe shitty (for some definition of shitty, as someone else would
say)
On 8/2/10 13:40 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
On 07/31/2010 07:22 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Here's a followup on a docs.zope.org automation task I took over during
one of the Zope developer IRC metings[1]. The task was to provide
individual package documentation, if it exists, directly underneath
On 8/2/10 16:46 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 2 August 2010 22:40, Jens Vagelpohlj...@dataflake.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 16:36 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday, August 02, 2010, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
'll have to look at that. Currently, the
On 7/30/10 13:31 , Baiju M wrote:
Hi,
Does class advisors like 'implements' and 'adapts' are going to work
in Python 3 ? If not, should we discourage its usage now ?
Regardless if they work or not I would love to have a decorator version
of them.
Wichert.
On 7/26/10 14:52 , Manabu TERADA wrote:
Hi
I think zope.index will not work for indexing simplified or traditional
Chinese. That is my observation of zope.index when I was working on
Plone4 CJK indexing. However by looking at SVN record of zope.indexing,
I see some changes. It could be
better in that I got search results, but there seems to be little
relation between my query and the result.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple
with randomly broken/bit-flipped input to
test robustness.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
that the request won't make it to
the application. Is that assumption testable?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Zope-Dev maillist
an unparsable request to the application.
I'm not sure I agree. Like everything else servers have bugs, so it
can't hurt to test how your application would behave given certain
server bugs.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net
On 7/15/10 17:03 , Dragos Chirila wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Why don’t you consider to use memcached for caching the results instead
of using sessions? By using this, Zeo server/Zeo clients restart wont
affect cached data.
or plone.memoize, using either a RAMCache or memcached as backend.
On 7/14/10 16:19 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Log message for revision 114741:
- LP #143533: Instead of showing 0.0.0.0 as server name when no
specific listening IP is configured for the HTTP server, do a
socket lookup to show the current server's fully qualified name.
Can I object to
On 7/14/10 16:43 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/14/10 16:28 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 7/14/10 16:19 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Log message for revision 114741:
- LP #143533: Instead of showing 0.0.0.0 as server name when no
specific
On 7/14/10 17:14 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/14/10 17:00 , Andreas Jung wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I don't mind doing this for a SERVER_NAME in the response, but looking
at the diff from the commit email you also changed the startup
in exception formatting. Perhaps a policy to check exceptions using a
try/except or self.assertRaises instead of relying on exact formatting
would be useful?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things
to allow specifying
features to be installed for a given egg.
That would be a very welcome change for SQLAlchemy as well: it has an
optional C extension to speed of marshalling data from SQL responses.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net It is simple to make things.
http
On 6/24/10 09:46 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/24/10 09:30 , Chris Withers wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
The misconfiguration of the mail host in transactional mode *does* cause
the server to go into a lockdown mode (because errors are not supposed
On 5/15/10 09:59 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 15 May 2010 15:39, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net
mailto:wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 5/10/10 17:24 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I fixed a few issues in z3c.form today. Can anyone make a 2.3.4
release?
Since I got no reaction
On 5/17/10 15:14 , Gediminas Paulauskas wrote:
2010/5/17 Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net:
On 5/15/10 09:59 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 15 May 2010 15:39, Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net
mailto:wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 5/10/10 17:24 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I fixed
On 5/10/10 20:16 , Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Where should bugreports for z3c.form be submitted? Its documentation
does not list an issue tracker, and there is no z3c.form project on
launchpad.
I just created one:
https
On 5/10/10 17:24 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I fixed a few issues in z3c.form today. Can anyone make a 2.3.4 release?
Since I got no reaction I'll repeat this request: can someone please
make a new z3c.form release? Looking at the pypi page there is no
shortage of people with the ability to do
Where should bugreports for z3c.form be submitted? Its documentation
does not list an issue tracker, and there is no z3c.form project on
launchpad.
Wichert.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**
I fixed a few issues in z3c.form today. Can anyone make a 2.3.4 release?
Wichert.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
On 5/3/10 12:20 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Good evening :)
If you have a specific issue with me, you might contact me in private.
But with your follow-ups this turned into a more general issue.
No, I think this needs to be public as the ZTK is a public project that
I
On 5/3/10 12:34 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I expect us to define the process around package releases and updating
the ZTK. It's not entirely clear to me who should and who is allowed
to update the ZTK definition. We'll figure things out and once we have
I'll
On 5/3/10 12:52 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I suggest that we wait impatiently for the ZTK steering committee to
come up with a useful policy instead of trying to do their work when
none of us volunteered for the task.
I don't understand your suggestion. Could you
On 5/3/10 13:07 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 5/3/10 12:51 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Can we please not rehash an old discussion or make this personal? This
has all been discussed too often already.
As far as I know, I've *never* discussed
On 5/3/10 15:41 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 13:22, Martijn Faassenfaas...@startifact.com wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Sorry, my mistake. I meant the ZTK release manage group, not the now
defunct ZTK steering group,
Well, if it's defunct
On 4/20/10 13:37 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Lennart Regebro wrote:
It replaces the custom doctest.py with monkey-patches.
I will report these to the Python bugtracker as well, although I have
no hope of getting them into Python 2.7. But that doesn't matter much.
:)
On 4/20/10 09:51 , yuppie wrote:
Hi!
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
v is the html as generated by my view. Reraising the exception transfers
control to the bare except in
ZPublisher.Publish.publish_module_standard, which generates the standard
site error page and returns that.
Could
On 4/20/10 09:51 , yuppie wrote:
Hi!
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
v is the html as generated by my view. Reraising the exception transfers
control to the bare except in
ZPublisher.Publish.publish_module_standard, which generates the standard
site error page and returns that.
Could
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
