On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Chris Withers wrote:
> Apologies for the cross-posting, but I think this is relevent to all
> these lists.
I think this is a valuable discussion. I don't think cross-posted
discussions work, though, so i'm replying in the various groups (except
zope-collector-monitor, whi
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:50:57 -0400 (EDT), Ken Manheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Accepted: Issues that some supporter(s) has responsibility for resolving
> it, and it is not yet resolved.
>
> Your description says that some supporter has assessed the
> iss
These definitions are how I've understood them since the inception of
the collector.
What I think Chris wants to do is to have a state that means "pending
rejection". He has defined "deferred" to mean this. I would prefer an
explicit "pending rejection" state, FWIW.
- C
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at
Ken Manheimer wrote at 2004-7-30 11:50 -0400:
>On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Chris Withers wrote:
> ...
>My intent for the states is different from what you suggested, in some
>cases significantly.
I like your intents!
--
Dieter
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL
Chris McDonough wrote:
These definitions are how I've understood them since the inception of
the collector.
What I think Chris wants to do is to have a state that means "pending
rejection". He has defined "deferred" to mean this. I would prefer an
explicit "pending rejection" state, FWIW.
I made
Oh, and I think "deferred" as saying "this should be fixed but is not
important" clashes with the Importance field.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Relat
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 12:31:25PM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote:
| That in turn means that what is actually missing is a way to distinguish
| between something that has just been submitted, and something that
| somebody has noticed. So I suggest a "submitted" state, as default state
| for new is
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Ken Manheimer wrote at 2004-7-30 11:50 -0400:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Chris Withers wrote:
...
My intent for the states is different from what you suggested, in some
cases significantly.
I like your intents!
Can you explain what bits specifically?
This comment currently doesn't ai
