--On 17. November 2005 15:36:23 +0100 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Delete the 2.9 branch at this time just for the sake of deleting it would
be stupid. I hope that Philipp will finish his work soon so this this
issue is not so important. That means:
2.9 branch: feature frozen, ope
--On 17. November 2005 07:45:48 +0800 Philipp von Weitershausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 16. November 2005 14:03:05 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does this mean that the existing 2.9 branch needs to be removed and that
the trunk remains frozen?
Andreas Jung wrote:
> --On 16. November 2005 14:03:05 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>
>> Does this mean that the existing 2.9 branch needs to be removed and that
>> the trunk remains frozen?
>>
>
> Didn't Florent delete the branch? Obviously he did not as I assumed.
> So in this
--On 16. November 2005 14:03:05 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does this mean that the existing 2.9 branch needs to be removed and that
the trunk remains frozen?
Didn't Florent delete the branch? Obviously he did not as I assumed.
So in this case Philipp needs to commit his f
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 19:47 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
> --On 14. November 2005 14:25:17 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 00:20 +0800, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> >> Florent Guillaume wrote:
> >> > BTW I'm for removing the 2.9 branch for now.
> >>
>
--On 14. November 2005 14:25:17 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 00:20 +0800, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
> BTW I'm for removing the 2.9 branch for now.
You didn't, so I presume 2.9 branch stays? It's important to clear the
statu
