Andrew Sawyers wrote:
What's up with zopefoundation.org - especially since it's changed since I
looked at it yesterday? :P)
We were making sure zopefoundation.org points to
www.zope.org/foundation. zopefoundation.org was on a completely separate
system that Mark Pratt was kind enough to set
http://modscape.com/zope
I added "Design 2". I like it much better than "Design 1". I think we
should work off of "Design 2" Thoughts?
On Aug 22, 2006, at 1:43 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
It's nearing september, and I'd like to start some work on
zope.org, in particular www.zop
Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
I'm here. I'll tweak the design per the suggestions below and send it
out. I actually worked on another one since then. Ill send that out as
well.
Tom, you're awesome! Thanks!
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-web maillist - Zo
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 8/22/06, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
I propose letting www.zope.org/foundation point to a Apache directory,
where we maintain HTML files. We will then generate such HTML files from
restructured text we maintain in the zope SVN repository, using a
[taking people off the cc list, changing the title]
Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
http://modscape.com/zope
I added "Design 2". I like it much better than "Design 1". I think we
should work off of "Design 2" Thoughts?
Hey, great!
I'm afraid I prefer design 1, myself. :) What do you like better ab
On 8/23/06, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do think it's faster to get going with this.
OK. We can always switch. I have a mantra: "If it works now, then use
it". This means to never hold out for something that might be better
in the future, because it aint gonna happen. :)
> Ho
On 8/23/06, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[taking people off the cc list, changing the title]
Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
> http://modscape.com/zope
> I added "Design 2". I like it much better than "Design 1". I think we
> should work off of "Design 2" Thoughts?
Hey, great!
I'm afra
On 8/23/06, Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do people think?
What you said. :-)
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/
___
Zope-web maillist - Zope-web@zope.org
htt
Hi,
I hope we can all have this together in a couple of weeks,
Weeks? Wasn't it working yesterday? :-)
On 8/22/06, Andrew Sawyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's up with zopefoundation.org - especially since it's changed
since I
looked at it yesterday? :P)
Yeah, I second that question. :
On 23 Aug 2006, at 12:57, Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
http://modscape.com/zope
I added "Design 2". I like it much better than "Design 1". I think
we should work off of "Design 2" Thoughts?
My vote is for Design 1. IMHO Design 2 gives me this gut feeling of a
site that wants to be overly fla
Looks like the first design is the preferred one. Maybe I just liked
the second because it was the most recent. You're points below are
all good. I'll try to work them all into a couple of new versions and
set up some sub pages as well. As far as the content in the main area
I haven't rea
Mark Pratt wrote:
[snip]
Doesn't matter what system is used but we certainly have less than
before -- unless anybody considers a zope.org page with 8 pdf downloads
progress.
I agree we have less than before, sorry. Then again, before we had two
foundation websites with diverging information,
Tom Von Lahndorff wrote:
Looks like the first design is the preferred one.
Okay, let's stick with design 1 then, it appears we got a consensus
about this from looking at the thread.
Maybe I just liked the
second because it was the most recent. You're points below are all good.
I'll try to
Hi there,
We seem to be making good process on layout and technology. Now as to
contents. What should the Zope Foundation website contain?
Right now we have a whole bunch of PDFs, some describe rules for the
foundation (bylaws, intellectual property policy), some of these are
signable agreem
Hi there,
This would seem to be low-hanging fruit, as it already works.
Right now we have planetzope.org. It'd be nice if we could put this
under planet.zope.org.
We seem to have two alternatives: make planet.zope.org point directly to
planetzope.org by doing something DNSy, or alternatively
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
This would seem to be low-hanging fruit, as it already works.
Right now we have planetzope.org. It'd be nice if we could put this
under planet.zope.org.
We seem to have two alternatives: make planet.zope.org point directly to
planetzope.org by doing somethin
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I propose we use Tom Von Lahndorff's design for the foundation website.
For the purposes of the foundation site we should strip it down:
+lots
* possibly no drop-down menus at the top. We could simply have links
there, or possibly a standard left-hand side navigation. T
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I agree we have less than before, sorry. Then again, before we had two
foundation websites with diverging information, and now we have one, so
that's progress. :)
+1
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix
18 matches
Mail list logo
