Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 October 2005 06:05, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>>Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
>>else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone actually
>>working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
> When more than one utility is selected for deleting in the site
> management view, only the first selected utility is deleted.
>
> The problem is that the content of regManager is changed inside the
> while iteratating over
Hi together
I like to simplify the macro registration.
The target is to get rid of the mapping in a custom class
where we use right now (StandardMacros) and offer a directive
for register macros in ZCML.
See the proposal at:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/Simpli
When more than one utility is selected for deleting in the site
management view, only the first selected utility is deleted.
The problem is that the content of regManager is changed inside the
while iteratating over it.
Here is the fix which works for me :
If this is applicable, can please someone
On 10/5/05, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
> > Where is this stateful workflow?
>
> zope.app.workflow. It's never been released, but it's available in the
> Zope 3 repository. It hasn't been worked on for over a year now and is
> pretty much still the
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 11:14, Jim Fulton wrote:
> > Well, it is covered in both books. People have worked on it, if I
> > remember correctly, to make it work with 3.1. Unfortunately I do not have
> > time to work on it right now. It is not part of the release, so it is not
> > that urgent to
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 06:05, Jim Fulton wrote:
Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
> Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
> else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone actually
> working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
> is a trap that
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 06:05, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
> else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone actually
> working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
> is a trap that we should
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone
actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a trap that we should get rid of. :)
Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>>
>> Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
>> else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone
>> actually
>> working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
>> is a trap that we shoul
Jim Fulton wrote:
Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a trap that we should get rid of. :)
Where is this stateful w
Stateful workflow was, initially, as much an experiment as anything
else. Now it seems to be a common source of questions. Is anyone actually
working on it? Does it have a champion? If not, then I suggest it
is a trap that we should get rid of. :)
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL P
13 matches
Mail list logo