Jim Fulton wrote:
[cut]
Your enhancements to check run time look very interesting,
but I think they ought to be proposed and discussed.
Please revert this change and then lets discuss what we want.
Done.
So, the main idea of the work we did last week on this topic
was to provide an easy
Hi Tim,
On Monday 10 October 2005 19:08, Tim Peters wrote:
[Tim Peters]
I'll attach a (long) list of current errors. Most seem related to
twisted, and may ultimately stem from that there is no fcntl module on
Windows.
Still true.
I have just seen a check in on Twisted from James Knight
On Sunday 09 October 2005 11:07, Jim Fulton wrote:
That changes a bit the way tests are to be called.
This is a fairly significant change to make without a proposal.
Right.
I would expect that there are a number of documentation resources
that would need to change as well.
Darn, I did not
Martijn Faassen schrieb:
Hi there,
I'm very curious to see what work was done on a Zope 3 website at the
Neckar sprint. Can someone send a report to the list?
The plan has been to migrate all the Wiki pages from zope.org to zope3.org.
The new thing is, that Wikipages should be editable
Uwe Oestermeier wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I'm very curious to see what work was done on a Zope 3 website at the
Neckar sprint. Can someone send a report to the list?
We (Dominik Huber, Tonico Strasser, Gregoire Weber, and I) set up a
zope3org package (http://svn.zope.org/zope3org/) with
Tonico Strasser wrote:
Martijn Faassen schrieb:
Hi there,
I'm very curious to see what work was done on a Zope 3 website at the
Neckar sprint. Can someone send a report to the list?
The plan has been to migrate all the Wiki pages from zope.org to zope3.org.
Interesting, and a bit sad to
I couldn't disagree more.
Moving Zope3 off of Zope.org is a big mistake. Zope 3 is part of Zope is
it not? Shouldn't it be on that website?
It just seems silly and short-sighted to try to break out one from the
other, when all Zopes (1/2/3..10/11/12) belong on that one website.
Wasn't that
Benji York wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
b) It is exactly the opposite of what we've been trying to do for the
last couple of months: convergence, not divergence!
I think that differentiating Zope 3 from Zope 2 is a good thing.
Sure. I never said that their differences
Hey Philipp,
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
[snip]
Here's my 2 cents, even if I might be too late (but hey, when should
I have brought this up?): I think it's a *bad* idea to host Zope 3 on
its own site, because:
a) It will be yet another systems we need maintainance volunteers
for. As it
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Here's my 2 cents, even if I might be too late (but hey, when should
I have brought this up?): I think it's a *bad* idea to host Zope 3 on
its own site, because:
a) It will be yet another systems we need maintainance volunteers
for. As it seems we don't even have
Roger Ineichen wrote:
wfmc question
Is it possible to get the particiapants where can start the
next activity before workItemFinished is called on a activity?
Conceivable, you could do something like this at the application
level. Within the worfklow framework though, you need an activity
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 03:53:23PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Perhaps we can come up with a similar scenario as what we think is going
to happen with Zope 2 and Zope 3. Zope 2 is the old, hard to maintain
system here, Zope 3 the new cool system. We intend to improve Zope 2 by
adding in
On Saturday 08 October 2005 07:24, Florian Lindner wrote:
what tools do you use for debugging your Zope applications and/or the Zope
source? Is there something more comforable (more graphical) than pdb
available? I've tried eric3 but it does not work, probably due to Zope3
spawning processes.
Martijn Faassen schrieb:
...
Has work been done on a reasonably slick layout for the website as well
or is this still planned?
Don't know about plans. After a short discussion on the sprint we have
agreed on starting with a very simple layout. It's not finished yet, it
should contain those
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 04:04, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
So, the main idea of the work we did last week on this topic
was to provide an easy tool to measure the performance of low-level code.
Note that I really liked the idea and how it was implemented. It would be nice
to get comments from other
Hello Florian,
I'm using Activestate Komodo for that. It's working quite well.
Well, sometimes it has glitches and it's not free.
Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 4:56:25 PM, you wrote:
SR On Saturday 08 October 2005 07:24, Florian Lindner wrote:
what tools do you use for debugging your Zope
Hello Stephan,
+1 on that.
Linux also fell in that trap not far ago that people kept adding stuff
and it slowed down the system.
Tuesday, October 11, 2005, 5:01:31 PM, you wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 04:04, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
So, the main idea of the work we did last week on this topic
Hi everyone,
I just finished summarizing the activities of the Neckar Sprint. You can see
it here:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/NeckarSprint
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 09:36, Jake wrote:
Why not spend the time and energy making Zope.org a better place than just
moving it off to yet another under-developed and utilized website?
zope.org has very different requirements than zope3.org. The reason we want
our own system is that we need
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 09:46, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
If you want to point out Zope 2's and Zope 3's differences, we can't
have information floating around on separate sites. The top #1 questions
on #zope that have to do with Zope 3 are:
1. Is Zope 3 mature enough to be developed
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 09:53, Martijn Faassen wrote:
From what I can see, the sprint focused on using Zope 3 technologies to
build a Zope 3 site. To use Zope 3 for a Zope 3 site seems a good idea
from the marketing perspective already -- we want to demonstrate we can
eat our own dogfood.
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 10:23, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
The whole WYSIWYG HTML-edit wiki thing is a neat idea involving using
HTML as the wiki markup language instead of something else. We'll
just have to see how that works out.
Yes, I just wonder whether we have to think about
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 09:36, Jake wrote:
Why not spend the time and energy making Zope.org a better place
than just moving it off to yet another under-developed and utilized
website?
zope.org has very different requirements than zope3.org. The reason
we want our
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 08:57, Martijn Faassen wrote:
As goals for the site, at least the top level of it, I'd suggest
marketing, and developer marketing primarily. We need to put across that
Zope 3 is powerful, cool, easy, extensible, and built on the vast amount
of experience with web
Reinoud van Leeuwen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 03:53:23PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Perhaps we can come up with a similar scenario as what we think is going
to happen with Zope 2 and Zope 3. Zope 2 is the old, hard to maintain
system here, Zope 3 the new cool system. We intend to
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 12:20, Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
zope.org will be very heavy. zope3.org will be very light; a simple
Wiki-like site that promotes collaboration. Even marketing is out of
scope right now.
Can you point me to the place where this was decided? Zope 3 is
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 08:57, Martijn Faassen wrote:
As goals for the site, at least the top level of it, I'd suggest
marketing, and developer marketing primarily. We need to put across that
Zope 3 is powerful, cool, easy, extensible, and built on the vast amount
of
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 12:20, Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
zope.org will be very heavy. zope3.org will be very light; a simple
Wiki-like site that promotes collaboration. Even marketing is out of
scope right now.
Can you point me to the place where this was
On 10/11/05, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- a ZWiki on a bare Zope 2 is set up within minutes
A ZWiki as found on the current zope.org is unusable, so I'll presume
you mean an up-to-date ZWiki, which I expect is much nicer.
Again (and I'm saying this again with the
Fred Drake wrote:
On 10/11/05, Philipp von Weitershausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- a ZWiki on a bare Zope 2 is set up within minutes
A ZWiki as found on the current zope.org is unusable, so I'll presume
you mean an up-to-date ZWiki, which I expect is much nicer.
Of course.
Again (and I'm
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 12:41, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
If anyone here really needs WYSIWYG, please make a point, but I doubt that
there will be one...
It's a top priority for Jim. Uwe and I agreed we would prefer ReST.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry
Stephan Richter wrote:
Log message for revision 39056:
Fixed bug from Philipp. Are you working on Windoze?
Now I see what you meant. Thanks... (I'm on MacOSX which is using HFS+,
another case-capable but -ignorant filesystem)
Changed:
U
I wanted to post something here last night about these conversations
I've been having in email with Ben Bangert, whose has the weblog
http://www.groovie.org/ and has written tools like Routes
http://routes.groovie.org/ - a tool for people who don't have the
benefit of nice zope.publisher style
(I think) rather than use fssync to export multiple 'sites' in a single Zope
instance, I'd much rather have multiple ZODB file storage instances -- i.e. one
Data.fs for each site. I have no requirement to share points or UI across these
sites -- I just want to eliminate having to run a separate
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 12:38, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Let's separate some concepts here:
* Zope 3 site: the new Zope 3 website with Zope 3 specific information.
This could be hosted under zope3.org but is not a requirement.
* dev wiki NG: New Zope 3 developer's wiki. This will be hosted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Shell wrote:
I wanted to post something here last night about these conversations
I've been having in email with Ben Bangert, whose has the weblog
http://www.groovie.org/ and has written tools like Routes
http://routes.groovie.org/ - a tool
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 13:24, Jeff Shell wrote:
I'd really like to give Zope 3 a try, and I keep trying to. The docs
are just nauseating. They might look good or fine to someone who's
used Zope for years, but to someone new they're horrid. As I
mentioned, the site is laid out horribly for
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 13:24, Jeff Shell wrote:
Personally, I really like the Z3ECM project site - z3lab.org. It has a
combination of blogs, papers, demos (animations) and documentation.
That's still a project in its infancy, but it's a good looking site
with a variety of sources feeding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 13:24, Jeff Shell wrote:
Personally, I really like the Z3ECM project site - z3lab.org. It has a
combination of blogs, papers, demos (animations) and documentation.
That's still a project in its
For reference, http://zopewiki.org is an up-to-date zope 2 zwiki (see
joyful.com for others), with mail-out/mail-in/external editor etc.
enabled. If you haven't checked it recently, please do check the new
organization by audience (down the left of the front page).
I did a html-only zwiki
On 10/11/05, Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 13:24, Jeff Shell wrote:
I'd really like to give Zope 3 a try, and I keep trying to. The docs
are just nauseating. They might look good or fine to someone who's
used Zope for years, but to someone new they're
On 10/11/05, Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 13:24, Jeff Shell wrote:
Personally, I really like the Z3ECM project site - z3lab.org. It has a
combination of blogs, papers, demos (animations) and documentation.
That's still a project in its infancy, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
The latest changes on the Zope3 trunk activate back the PTP server by
default within the zope.conf files.
I deactivated it by default weeks ago under global agreement. Can I
deactivate it back on trunk ?
J.
- --
Julien Anguenot |
Hi Tim,
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 17:31, Tim Peters wrote:
[Michael Kerrin]
I have just seen a check in on Twisted from James Knight which should fix
fcntl import problem in twisted.web2.channel.cgi
I have also being in contact with Itamar Shtull-Trauring from the Twisted
community
On 10/11/05, Simon Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS - I believe you can predict a site's and its project's success based
on whether it f*ks^H^H^H shrinks the fonts. Seriously. :) php.net,
drupal.org, gnome.org, debian.org leave the font alone.
You may be on to something. :-)
New theory:
[Michael Kerrin]
I have just changed the svn:external for Twisted to a more stable 2.1 branch
which should contain the fix for the Windows problem you reported. I still
haven't checked Zope on windows yet because of a problem in the with FTP but
I have being assured that it will run.
I will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Shell
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 11:27 AM
To: Stephan Richter
Cc: zope3-dev@zope.org
Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] Why I posted about Zope3.org (the outsider's
thoughtsthat got me thinking)
On
Hi,
the current trunk produces two unit-test and one functional-test failures
when running `make test`[0].
python: 2.4.2
gcc: 4.0.1
[0] Tracebacks:
Failure in test /usr/src/zope3-svn/src/zope/testing/testrunner-coverage.txt
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Andreas Jung said:
Export/import is likely much more important than being able to edit
content on the filesystem. Writing simple mechanisms for
exporting/importing schema-based content to XML/from XML should not be
so hard.
Yeah. And sometimes XML just gets in the way - namely, when you
Sorry for the indentation problem Jeff's post and mine got combined.
-Original Message-
snip
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES OH GOD YES!
I mean. Yes! Backup/restore, and deploy. We're deploying a customers
site in chunks - one section, then another, then a third. It's content
that's being migrated off of Zope 2. The other developer here was
complaining about
51 matches
Mail list logo
