On Mar 7, 2006, at 6:56 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Mar 6, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Jake wrote:
I think it is a huge mistake to lose Zope branding. After years of
building up momentum behind a project, to head off into some
strange developer code speak is just going to lose people who are
not
the *right way* :)
TTW is very very useful. Not everyone has access to all of the tools
all of the time. I have been developing in Zope for at least 5 years
and 90% of what I do to build websites is TTW.
Options are good, they are called "features".
Jake
http://www.ZopeZone.c
m actually happy with the
way things are working now. Let's not fix what isn't broken. We can
make incremental steps to making it better, and I'm glad people are
starting to understand the ideas behind Five, but I don't see the
need for a change of direction.
Rega
OS9 -> Mac OSX (10)
Here was a mistake:
Mosaic -> Netscape -> Netscape Communicator -> Netscape Gold ->
Firebird -> Mozilla -> Firefox
How about:
Zope 2 -> Zope 3
You can change the core technologies, the packaging, the identity,
but don't change the name.
That is a good set of ideas. Zope 2 installs into Zope 3.
Jake
http://www.ZopeZone.com
"Zoping for the rest of us"
On Feb 27, 2006, at 10:00 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday 27 February 2006 11:06, Lennart Regebro wrote:
I like the vision of Zope2 becoming a set of extra pa
asn't that the point of moving CMF back from cmf.zope.org?
Why not spend the time and energy making Zope.org a better place than just
moving it off to yet another under-developed and utilized website?
My $.03
Jake
--
http://www.ZopeZone.com
Benji York said:
> Philipp von Weitershausen
2.3.4 -> 2.4, etc.
Jake
--
http://www.ZopeZone.com
Jim Fulton said:
> Jake wrote:
>> IIRC, it was supposed to go:
>
> I don't know where you would have gotten this recollection.
>
>> 2.7 -> 2.8 -> 2.9 -> 3.0 (merge)
>
> No, there will certainly be 2
I agree.
Drop the X when X3 has 2X support in it.
Jake
--
http://www.ZopeZone.com
Chris Withers said:
> Jake wrote:
>
>> Well, that sounds like a nightmare.
>>
>> So we might have X3.1, 3.0 being released at the same time? Talk about
>> confusing to the outsid
Well, that sounds like a nightmare.
So we might have X3.1, 3.0 being released at the same time? Talk about
confusing to the outside world.
This needs some rethinking.
Jake
--
http://www.ZopeZone.com
Stephan Richter said:
> On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:07, Jake wrote:
>> 2.7 ->
IIRC, it was supposed to go:
2.7 -> 2.8 -> 2.9 -> 3.0 (merge)
X3.0 -> X3.1 -> 3.0 (merge)
And that was the whole point of putting X in front of the 3, so you would
know it was not really Zope 3.0, but X3.
Jake
--
http://www.ZopeZone.com
Stephan Richter said:
> On Wednesda
10 matches
Mail list logo
