RE: [Zope3-Users] Re: Zope 3 Capacities

2006-01-22 Thread David Johnson
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Fulton Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 10:06 AM To: Jeff Rush Cc: zope3-users@zope.org Subject: Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: Zope 3 Capacities Jeff Rush wrote: ... I've always wondered why ZODB didn't offer an option of storing the object

Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: Zope 3 Capacities

2006-01-22 Thread Stephan Richter
On Sunday 22 January 2006 11:11, David Johnson wrote: I think we will probably proceed on trying to make a MySQL adapter that can replace GadFly -- hopefully possible and not TOO much work.  I think that and a better SQL container (maybe sqlos) would solve our issues, as well as be a great

Re: [Zope3-Users] Re: Zope 3 Capacities

2006-01-22 Thread matt wilbert
It probably won't meet their needs either, but the latest version of DirectoryStorage is supposed to be compatible with Zope3.It might mitigate the startup time and index memory consumption issues somewhat, especially if they can use reiserfs. http://dirstorage.sourceforge.net/MattOn 1/22/06, Jeff

[Zope3-Users] Re: Zope 3 Capacities

2006-01-21 Thread Jeff Rush
David Johnson wrote: In general we’re looking at using an RDBMS, but we’re trying to get a better feeling of when we can use the ZODB and when we should stick to the RDBMS. We have various datasets: 1. Transactions: 10-100 billion objects 2. Users: 10-100 million objects 3.