On Tuesday 07 August 2001 11:00 pm, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> set temp1_over 52
>
> 52�C should be the threshold which triggers alarm if the temperature
> goes _OVER_ this value. And when it has cooled down thus far
>
> set temp1_hyst 40
>
> alarm will be stopped again.
>
> BUT the sensors output reports
>
> limit = +40�C, hysteresis = +52�C)
Mine is the same. I have:
set temp1_over 55
set temp1_hyst 50
Output is:
SYS Temp: +45.8�C (limit = +50�C, hysteresis = +55�C)
In this case, despite the labels, the alarm will go off at 55, and turn
off at 50.
Although I'd still argue that if it were changed, people would find
fault with the following scenario:
If the values are swapped, and limit is 50, hysteresis is 55....
Once the alarm is triggered, you could have output like:
SYS Temp: +52.8�C (limit = +55�C, hysteresis = +50�C) ALARM
Don't get me wrong, I agree the output is confusing. Changing it to:
SYS Temp: +45.8�C (alarm_off = +50�C, high_limit_alarm = +55�C)
would make more sense to me. :)
> which is swapped. Now, a while ago someone posted this on the
> Seawolf list:
>
> set temp_over 30
> set temp_hyst 5
>
> limit = +30�C, hysteresis = +5�C
>
> Here it is NOT swapped.
Different people have contributed code for various sensor chips. I
wonder if perhaps some chips have the values reversed in the code, and
others don't? I have a via686a chip.
-D
_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
