-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Chris,

While I am not a DNS expert (far from it), I have hear that the syntax
has been tightened up in Bind 9, so you may want to double check your
files.


JBB


Sunday, September 16, 2001, 3:50:53 AM, you wrote:

CR> I finally took the plunge and upgraded my last RH 7.0 machine to 7.1 a
CR> week or so ago, and all is good, except for transfers of DNS zones for
CR> which this machine is a slave.

CR> There are three domains that this machine is a slave server for, and all
CR> three are giving me entries like this in the logs:

CR> Sep 16 00:40:09.720 refresh_callback: zone domain.com/IN:
CR> non-authoritative answer from 111.222.333.444#53

CR> Where 111.222.333.444 is the master listed in the named.conf file.  These
CR> transfers worked fine in BIND 8, it was only after upgrading to BIND 9
CR> that they broke.

CR> The strange thing is that I've got another RH 7.1 machine on a different
CR> network that's also a slave for one of these domains, which isn't having
CR> any problems at all doing the zone transfers.

CR> Has anybody seen anything like this before, or have any ideas what could
CR> be causing a problem like this?

CR> I can make a copy of my named.conf available, upon request.  Don't
CR> particularly care to post it on a publicly archived list. :)

CR> Thanks,
CR> --Chris.




CR> _______________________________________________
CR> Seawolf-list mailing list
CR> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CR> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list



- --
Best regards,
 Jonathan                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjul6TEACgkQxQhxe/20cF4iOwCgpGJ/rmtEBwlpGi6FllUDWpkq
I8IAoKtX2uc97T/emjibEqYvfGtmvvDN
=1WqV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list

Reply via email to