On Wednesday 10 October 2001 12:43, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Actually, in case of gcc, you want gcc-2.96-NN where NN is the latest from
> Red Hat you find (including rawhide), but this is for gcc-2.96 only and
> not a general rule. The intent is that every new gcc rpm should be a good
> errata candidate (but unless you want a sparc gcc-2.96, 2.96-98 and
> 2.96-99 are otherwise the same).
>
As I'm in trouble with the connection, I have downloaded only the sources:
[neugens@nirvana new]$ rpm --rebuild gcc-2.96-93.src.rpm
Installing gcc-2.96-93.src.rpm
error: failed build dependencies:
binutils >= 2.11.90.0.8-3 is needed by gcc-2.96-93
I'll try with the 2.96-99, just to have the latest "less bugged" release (I
found it a good compiler for the use I have to do, anyway, I can compile
everything, never had an error)
Are the rawhide binutils a safe package too?
Thank you,
Mario
--
-=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=-
Gnu Privacy Guard public key:
http://digilander.iol.it/linuxlabs/people/signature.html
--------------------------------------------------------
http://www.frinemusic.f2s.com
http://digilander.iol.it/linuxlabs
-=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=-
Support The Free Software ** Open Your Mind
-=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=-
--
===========================================================
hack:
[very common] 1. n. Originally, a quick job that
produces what is needed, but not well.
http://www.tuxedo.org/jargon/html/entry/hack.html
_______________________________________________
Seawolf-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/seawolf-list
