----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Bremer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > number of reasons. Can people here suggest a low-cost (or free), > > secure, easy-to-administer replacement?? > > Apache. Version 1.3.x of Apache doesn't perform as well as IIS > when running on windows, but since you said it was a low volume > web site, it should be fine. If you need the performance, you can > try the new Apache 2.x. The initial benchmarks shows that it > performs as well as IIS when running on windows. Apache 2.x is > pretty new, but I'll bet it's still far more secure than IIS. OK, so far it's Apache 10 votes. Anything else, 0 votes. <G> The one thing that's kept me from trying it is the implementation. Remember, one of my criteria was "easy-to-administer" and I've heard that Apache is totally command/console driven vs. web or gui administerable. Tom G
