I have used Slackware for most of my (computer) life, until I changed to Debian. The problem with some distros that automates lots of things (linuxconf, rpm, and even apt), is that in the end, you don't learn Linux, you learn Red Hat, Debian, etc. If you want to learn Linux, then go with Slackware, you'll be able to do everything you want (most software must be downloaded as source, compiled and then installed, no out-of-the-box configurator like Red Hat has, etc). I like it. It's kinda lighter than other distros, and you really can do whatever you want to do without fear of "breaking package system", and other stuff. Just go and edit whatever you wish. Anyway, I would encourage you to try it. If you don't like it in the end, at least it will be an experience.
Thomas Madhavan [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I'm pretty much a LInux newbie, been using Redhat 7.0 up til recently > when it decided to die. So, I was thinking of having a little look > around at other distrbutions. > > I've read differing opinions about the ease of use of Slackware - what > are your personal opinions? Is Slackware more secure 'out of the box'? > From what I gather Slackware is a little harder to learn than Redhat, > but a little more... configurable? Am I right? I have no problems with > using the console and learning anything the hard way :D > > What advantages/disadvanages does Slackware 8.0 have over Redhat 7.0? -- Bruno Lustosa, aka Lofofora | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator/Web Programmer | ICQ UIN: 1406477 Rio de Janeiro - Brazil |
