U.S. DoD - seven pass extended character rotation wiping [DoD 5200.28-STD].
And for the sake of argument the program i use has a limit of 100 passes.
----- Original Message -----
From: "maillist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 7:45 AM
Subject: RE: Interesting One


> I disagree with you both - the NSA standard for a drive that will be
> recycled is a nine-pass wipe ... involving pseudo-random data, 0s and 1s
...
> preferably in a non-predictable order ...
>
> Reading after thirty overwrites is just scare mongering.  Depending on the
> media it might just be possible on some drives (where the heads have moved
> over time) ... but the kit to read from drives after just a couple of
wipes
> is expensive, and usually just the provision of government types ...
>
> Avoiderman
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nero, Nick [mailto:Nick.Nero@;disney.com]
> > Sent: 29 October 2002 17:30
> > To: Dave Adams; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Interesting One
> >
> >
> > Well, the NSA standard I believe is that zero-filling a drive (writing
> > all 0's to the platter) will make the data impossible to recover, but I
> > am sure there are some instances when this isn't the cause depending on
> > how retentive the media is and all that.  If is electromagnetically
> > degaussed for an extended period of time, I can't imagine anything could
> > recover the data.
> >
> > Nick Nero, CISSP
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Adams [mailto:dadams@;johncrowley.co.uk]
> > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 5:06 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Interesting One
> >
> >
> > Greetings Folks,
> >
> > I had an interesting conversation today with someone from FAST
> > (Federation Against Software Theft) They pretend not to be a snitch wing
> > of the BSA. Anyway, to get to the point, the guy that came to see me
> > said that their forensics guys could read data off a hard drive that had
> > been written over up to thirty times. I find this very hard to believe
> > and told him I thought he was mistaken but the guy was adamant that it
> > could be done. My question is, does anyone have any views on this, or,
> > can anyone point me to a source of information where I can get the facts
> > on exactly how much data can be retrieved off a hard drive and under
> > what conditions etc etc.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Dave Adams


Reply via email to