I think that if any data would be recovered after rewritten 30 times, we can
expect a disk of 20GB have 600GB of data to be recovered. Also we need to
know the correct nth version of the FAT in order to recover clusters in the
right order. I think this is really difficult to do.

Pablo A. C. Gietz
Jefe de Seguridad Informática
Nuevo Banco de Entre Ríos S.A.
Te.: 0343 - 4201351
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:06 PM
Subject: Interesting One


> Greetings Folks,
>
> I had an interesting conversation today with someone from FAST
> (Federation
> Against Software Theft) They pretend not to be a snitch wing of the BSA.
> Anyway, to get to the point, the guy that came to see me said that their
> forensics guys could read data off a hard drive that had been written
> over
> up to thirty times. I find this very hard to believe and told him I
> thought
> he was mistaken but the guy was adamant that it could be done. My
> question
> is, does anyone have any views on this, or, can anyone point me to a
> source
> of information where I can get the facts on exactly how much data can be
> retrieved off a hard drive and under what conditions etc etc.
>
> Thanks
>
> Dave Adams
>
>
>
> This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
> use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
> contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
> constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
> you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
> distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
> it from your computer. Messages sent to and from
> John Crowley (Maidstone) Ltd may be monitored.
>
> Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
> late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, we do not accept
> responsibility for any errors or omissions that are present in this
> message, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail
> transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy
> version. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
> and do not necessarily represent those of John Crowley (Maidstone) Ltd.
>


Reply via email to