So what were the results from your run on the T4? performance wise.
On 4/29/2011 11:14 AM, Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng wrote:
Right, good point. I'll update the bugster w/ evaluation on
CKM_SSL3_KEY_AND_MAC_DERIVE and CKM_TLS_KEY_AND_MAC_DERIVE.
True, conceptually this should be done for every release. Although,
realistically, I don't think we'll need to adjust this again for jdk8
given that the remaining Solaris bugs have already been closed. But
still, I'll add a sub-CR for jdk8, so we can check and cross it off
later (not really worthy of a P2 for jdk 8 though).
Thanks,
Valerie
On 04/29/11 05:45 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
This looks fine. However, the bug report never mentions why it is ok
to remove the CKM_SSL3_KEY_AND_MAC_DERIVE and
CKM_TLS_KEY_AND_MAC_DERIVE mechanisms. I think it should be updated.
Also, isn't this the kind of thing we should periodically review each
release? If so, maybe we should create a sub-CR for JDK 8, keep that
open, and re-evaluate later.
--Sean
On 4/28/11 8:59 PM, Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng wrote:
Sean,
Could you please review this PKCS11 configuration file change before
next Monday?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/7036252/webrev.00/
I have run the regression tests against the new config file and
things look fine.
More information can be found in the bugster record.
Thanks,
Valerie
