Oops, I didn't realized you've already reviewed it until I see see the whole thread after the "ping again" mail. Must be because your mail does not have name in either TO or CC.
On Jul 21, 2014, at 19:12, Sean Mullan <[email protected]> wrote: > Why does the test have a 2009,2011 copyright? Otherwise, looks ok to me. I copied a test nearby and modified it into the new test. Will fix. Thanks Max > > --Sean > > On 07/07/2014 10:12 PM, Wang Weijun wrote: >> Please review the code change at >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8048194/webrev.00 >> >> The original code goes on accepting the input mechToken even if it's of an >> unsupported mech. It also mistakenly interprets the input token as a mech >> token instead of a NegTokenTarg at the 2nd step. >> >> Thanks >> Max >>
