Hi Sean, Max,
do you think we need property jdk.includeInExceptions=jar<File/Path> at all, if
we don't resolve the absolute path?
@Matthias:
small remark to the code:
src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/SecurityProperties.java
36 public static String privilegeGetOverridable(String propName) {
Should that method really be public? At the moment it doesn't seem to be used
outside of SecurityProperties.
Best regards
Christoph
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Weijun Wang <[email protected]>
> Sent: Montag, 10. September 2018 16:43
> To: Sean Mullan <[email protected]>
> Cc: Baesken, Matthias <[email protected]>; Langer, Christoph
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; core-libs-
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [RFR] 8205525 : Improve exception messages during manifest
> parsing of jar archives
>
>
>
> > On Sep 10, 2018, at 10:35 PM, Sean Mullan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> After the changes I wonder - should the jarPath category be renamed
> to jarFile (or something else) ?
> >
> > Yes, renaming it to "jarFile" makes more sense. You will need to update the
> CSR with this change too.
>
> Well, maybe either is OK.
>
> I am still thinking that one day we could make this more precise, for example:
>
> /path/to/lib.jar!META-INF/MANIFEST.MF:23
> /path/to/lib.jar!META-INF/SIGNER.SF:34
>
> The name should (at least vaguely) cover these info.
>
> --Max
