Hello, please check the new webrev  :

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8205525.10/

I kept the jarPath   category name .

Best regards, Matthias


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Langer, Christoph
> Sent: Montag, 10. September 2018 21:30
> To: Weijun Wang <weijun.w...@oracle.com>; Baesken, Matthias
> <matthias.baes...@sap.com>
> Cc: Sean Mullan <sean.mul...@oracle.com>; security-
> d...@openjdk.java.net; core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: RE: [RFR] 8205525 : Improve exception messages during manifest
> parsing of jar archives
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > > do you think we need property jdk.includeInExceptions=jar<File/Path> at
> > all, if we don't resolve the absolute path?
> >
> > I think so. File path is still sensitive.
> >
> > In fact, I tend to believe people usually use absolute paths for JAR files 
> > (or
> > maybe made absolute by using a file:// URL somewhere inside JDK). Do
> you
> > really see relative jar paths while testing this code change?
> 
> I agree.
> 
> > > small remark to the code:
> > > src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/SecurityProperties.java
> > > 36     public static String privilegeGetOverridable(String propName) {
> > >
> > > Should that method really be public? At the moment it doesn't seem to
> be
> > used outside of SecurityProperties.
> >
> > I like it to be public. There are quite some other such system/security
> > properties (Ex: jdk.serialFilter) that can make use of this method.
> 
> Ok, maybe it should be named "priviledgedGetOverridable" then.
> 
> @Matthias:
> Further small cleanups, as you touch the files:
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/jar/Manifest.java: line 35: you can
> remove "import java.util.Iterator;"
> 
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/net/util/SocketExceptions.java:
> line 41: indentation is ridiculously long, I think it should be 8 chars
> 
> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/util/SecurityProperties.java:
> Indentation of lines 38-45 is too deep, should be 12.
> The 2 methods could use a brief Javadoc.
> 
> Best regards
> Christoph

Reply via email to