Rethinking about this. Although this sspi.cpp is included in OpenJDK, it was meant to be a pure standalone DLL that has nothing to do with JNI or JVM. Adding this "JDK_" thing would be a tiny taint to the whole program. I'd rather make it SSPI_BRIDGE_TRACE. Is that better? Or still SSPI_TRACE?
--Max > On May 31, 2019, at 10:48 PM, Weijun Wang <weijun.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> I would think JDK_SSPI_TRACE would be a better name... > > Yes, I can.
